2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Octaviar Administration Pty Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Octaviar Administration Pty Ltd. Anchor | green | “there is a line of authority that supports the fact that prepetition deposits or retainers can supply 'property' sufficient to make a foreign debtor eligible to file in the united states.” | 3 |
| 2 | In re Berau Capital Resources Pte Ltd. | green | “the court concludes that the presence of the new york choice of law and forum selection clauses in the berau indenture satisfies the section 109(a) 'property in the united states' eligibility requirement.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.