7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 61 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Myles v. Astrue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Myles v. Astrue Anchor | green | “on remand, the alj should consider all of the evidence in the record, and, if necessary, give the parties the opportunity to expand the record so that he may build a 'logical bridge' between the evidence and his conclusions” | 18 |
| 2 | Cheryl Beardsley v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “where conflicting evidence allows reasonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is entitled to benefits, the court must defer to the commissioner's resolution of that conflict.” | 17 |
| 3 | Samuel v. Barnhart | green | “by failing to include in his narrative discussion a description of how the medical evidence supported his findings, the alj committed a clear error of law.” | 5 |
| 4 | Margaret Grotts v. Kilolo Kijakazi | green | “when criticizes the alj's analysis of her daily functioning, her good and bad days, and her pain, she is ... inviting us to reweigh the evidence.” | 4 |
| 5 | Debra Prill v. Kilolo Kijakazi | green | “substantial evidence supports the al's determination that prill's account of her subjective symptoms was not consistent with her medical records.” | 3 |
| 6 | Seamon v. Astrue | green | “the alj, however, is not only allowed to, but indeed must, weigh the evidence and make appropriate inferences from the record.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.