Topic: a preliminary injunction is always appropriate to grant int… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #567

4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United States Anchor
scotus · 1945
green “a preliminary injunction is always appropriate to grant intermediate relief of the same character as that which may be granted finally.” 35
2 Maddox v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
ca7 · 2013
green “an injunction, like any 'enforcement action,' may be entered only against a litigant, that is, a party that has been served and is under the jurisdiction of the district court” 6
3 Maddox v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
ca7 · 2013
green “observing that n injunction, like any 'enforcement action,' may be entered only against a litigant, that is, a party that has been served and is under the jurisdiction of the district court” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check