5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ingraham v. Wright.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ingraham v. Wright Anchor | green | “eighth amendment scrutiny is appropriate only after the state has complied with the constitutional guarantees traditionally associated with criminal prosecutions.” | 31 |
| 2 | Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc. | green | “tate law on attorney's fees is substantive, so state law applies in diversity cases.” | 6 |
| 3 | Kona Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate Of Bernice Pauahi Bishop | green | “a federal court sitting in diversity applies the law of the forum state regarding an award of attorneys' fees.” | 4 |
| 4 | Surrell v. California Water Service Co. | green | “the jurisdictional scope of a title vii claimant's court action depends upon the scope of the eeoc charge and the eeoc investigation that can reasonably be expected to grow out of the charge.” | 3 |
| 5 | Rasidescu v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. | green | “plaintiff provides these damage values without any comment as to how he is entitled to these damages, or what connection these extremely large damages amounts have with the alleged claims” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.