Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 670 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Dominguez Benitez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Dominguez Benitez Anchor | green | “must show a reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered the plea.” | 466 |
| 2 | United States v. Dominguez Benitez | green | “the probability of a different result is 'sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome' of the proceeding.” | 140 |
| 3 | United States v. Vonn | green | “may consult the whole record when considering the effect of any error on substantial rights.” | 64 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.