5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Michelle Johnson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michelle Johnson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security Anchor | green | “the administrative law judge cannot disbelieve testimony solely because it seems in excess of the 'objective' medical testimony.” | 14 |
| 2 | Martinez v. Astrue | green | “there is no explanation of which of statements are not entirely credible or how credible or noncredible any of them are.” | 11 |
| 3 | Parker v. Astrue | green | “it is not only boilerplate; it is meaningless boilerplate.” | 10 |
| 4 | Christine Bjornson v. Michael Astru | green | “the present 'template,' . . . is even worse . . . .” | 4 |
| 5 | Christine Bjornson v. Michael Astru | green | “the present 'template,' ... is even worse ....” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.