4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Omar Gomaa Orabi v. Attorney General United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Omar Gomaa Orabi v. Attorney General United States Anchor | green | “we may take judicial notice of the contents of another court's docket.” | 28 |
| 2 | United Jersey Banks v. Parell | green | “it is one of the settled principles of federal jurisdiction jurisprudence that the federal question must appear on the face of the complaint, and that federal jurisdiction cannot be created by anticipating a defense based on federal law.” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. Martorano, George, A/K/A Cowboy. Appeal of George Martorano | green | “motions to recuse under 28 u.s.c. 455 (a) must rest on the kind of objective facts that a reasonable person would use to evaluate whether an appearance of impropriety had been created, not on 'possibilities' and unsubstantiated allegations.” | 4 |
| 4 | Green Tree Servicing LLC v. Dillard | green | “ecause the face of plaintiff's complaint identifies no federal question, this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, irrespective of defendants' reliance upon a federal defense and/or assertion of a federal counterclaim.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.