Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 594 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Henderson v. Shinseki.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henderson v. Shinseki Anchor | green | “federal courts have an independent obligation to ensure that they do not exceed the scope of their jurisdiction, and therefore they must raise and decide jurisdictional questions that the parties either overlook or elect not to press.” | 331 |
| 2 | Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger | red | “diversity jurisdiction does not exist unless each defendant is a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff.” | 185 |
| 3 | Bayerische Landesbank, New York Branch v. Aladdin Capital Management LLC | green | “takes the citizenship of each of its members.” | 70 |
| 4 | In Re Bank of America Corp. Securities, Derivative, & Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation | green | “because the derivative plaintiffs have not alleged the citizenship of each of the llc financial advisors' members, they have not alleged facts sufficient to invoke this court's subject matter jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.