4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Franklin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Franklin Anchor | green | “ankruptcy courts must retain jurisdiction to construe their own orders 1f they are to be capable of monitoring whether those orders are ultimately executed in the intended manner.” | 10 |
| 2 | Richard Gonzales, Juliana Gonzales and Michael Dodge v. Barbara Parks and Jerome Parks | green | “filings of bankruptcy petitions are a matter of exclusive federal jurisdiction.” | 10 |
| 3 | In Re Comscape Telecommunications, Inc. | green | “the court has subject-matter jurisdiction over a bankruptcy case even when a part in interest alleges that the petition was unauthorized.” | 10 |
| 4 | Peter Ullrich v. Kenneth A. Welt | green | “indeed, bankruptcy courts have consistently ruled on authority-to-file questions after implicitly assuming jurisdiction pursuant to 28 u.s.c. 1334 .” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.