5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan Anchor | green | “qualified immunity is no immunity at all if 'clearly established' law can simply be defined as the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.” | 17 |
| 2 | Fraire v. City Of Arlington | green | “egardless of what had transpired up until the shooting itself, movements gave the officer reason to believe, at that moment, that there was a threat of physical harm.” | 7 |
| 3 | Bazan Ex Rel. Bazan v. Hidalgo County | green | “threshold issue" on qualified immunity appeal "is whether the facts the district judge concluded are genuinely disputed are also material” | 4 |
| 4 | Randy Cole v. Michael Hunter | green | “cole began to turn counterclockwise.” | 4 |
| 5 | Cole v. Hunter | green | “he evidence supports plaintiffs' argument that cole did not know of the officers' presence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.