5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Holocaust Victims of v. OTP Bank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holocaust Victims of v. OTP Bank Anchor | green | “specific jurisdiction is jurisdiction over a specific claim based on the defendant's contacts with the forum that gave rise to or are closely connected to the claim itself.” | 15 |
| 2 | BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. v. IEC (Montgomery), LLC | green | “he fact that a party breaks a contract doesn't show that its promise to perform it had been fraudulent when made-that is, that the party had never intended to perform it.” | 7 |
| 3 | Multi-Ad Services, Incorporated, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner | green | “it is well-settled that parties may not raise new arguments or present new facts for the first time in reply.” | 5 |
| 4 | Desnick v. American Broadcasting Companies, Incorporated | green | “romissory fraud is actionable only if it either is particularly egregious or . . . is embedded in a larger pattern of deceptions or enticements that reasonably induces reliance and against which the law ought to provide a remedy.” | 4 |
| 5 | Ault v. C.C. Services, Inc. | green | “lleged misrepresentations must be statements of present or preexisting facts, and not statements of future intent or conduct.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.