Topic: the evidence of the non-movant is to be believed, and all j… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #85

8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 223 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. Anchor
scotus · 1986
green “the evidence of the non-movant is to be believed, and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in his favor.” 166
2 Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United States
ca5 · 2001
green “when a rule 12(b)(1) motion is filed in conjunction with other rule 12 motions, the court should consider the rule 12(b)(1) jurisdictional attack before addressing any attack on the merits.” 26
3 Davis v. Tarrant County, Tex.
ca5 · 2009
green “in ruling on a motion to dismiss, a court accepts all well-pleaded facts as true, viewing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” 13
4 Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Willie Harried, e
ca5 · 2012
green “the rooker-feldman doctrine does not apply to this case because adjudicating claims did not require the district court to review any final judgment rendered by a state court.” 5
5 Higgins v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
txwd · 2011
green “a motion to dismiss for lack of article iii standing is properly considered under rule 12(b)(1).” 4
6 Harvill v. Westward Communications, L.L.C.
ca5 · 2005
green “solated incidents, if egregious, can alter the terms and conditions of employment.” 3
7 Colleen Curran v. Phillip Aleshire
ca5 · 2015
green “a plaintiff's version of the facts should not be accepted for purposes of qualified immunity when it is 'blatantly contradicted' and 'utterly discredited' by video recordings.” 3
8 Denning v. Bond Pharmacy
ca5 · 2022
green “endering an award of damages in favor of denning does not redress her insurer's injury of being subjected to ais's unauthorized billing practices.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check