Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 466 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from County of Los Angeles v. Davis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | County of Los Angeles v. Davis Anchor | green | “interim relief or events have completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged violation.” | 282 |
| 2 | United States v. W. T. Grant Co. | green | “voluntary cessation of allegedly illegal conduct does not deprive the tribunal of power to hear and determine the case, i.e., does not make the case moot.” | 102 |
| 3 | Conservation Force, Inc. v. Sally Jewell | green | “the court can provide no effective remedy because a party has already 'obtained all the relief that it has sought.” | 38 |
| 4 | County of Los Angeles v. Davis | green | “when both conditions are satisfied it may be said that the case is moot because neither party has a legally cognizable interest in the final determination of the underlying questions of fact and law.” | 32 |
| 5 | Gerdau Ameristeel Corp. v. United States | green | “thus, to avoid dismissal for mootness, an actual controversy must remain at all stages, not merely at the time the complaint is filed.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.