7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carpenters Industrial Council v. Ryan Zinke.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carpenters Industrial Council v. Ryan Zinke Anchor | green | “a dollar of economic harm is still an injury-in-fact for standing purposes.” | 9 |
| 2 | Public Citizen Friends of the Earth, Inc. Sierra Club v. United States Trade Representative | green | “franklin is limited to those cases in which the president has final constitutional or statutory responsibility for the final step necessary for the agency action directly to affect the parties.” | 4 |
| 3 | Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak | green | “we do not require any indication of congressional purpose to benefit the would-be plaintiff.” | 4 |
| 4 | Miguel-Miguel v. Gonzales | green | “we view the unhcr handbook as persuasive authority in interpreting the scope of refugee status under domestic asylum law.” | 3 |
| 5 | Melvin Wallace v. ConAgra Foods, Inc. | green | “the consumers' alleged economic harm-even if only a few pennies each-is a concrete, non- speculative injury.” | 3 |
| 6 | Carpenters Industrial Council v. Ryan Zinke | green | “economic harm to a business clearly constitutes an injury-in-fact. and the amount is irrelevant. a dollar of economic harm is still an injury-in-fact for standing purposes.” | 3 |
| 7 | East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald Trump | green | “o say that one may apply for something that one has no right to receive is to render the right to apply a dead letter.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.