13 C.F.R. § 124.101
What are the basic requirements a concern must meet for the 8(a) BD program?
Generally, a concern meets the basic requirements for admission to the 8(a) BD program if it is a small business which is unconditionally owned and controlled by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals who are of good character and citizens of and residing in the United States, and which demonstrates potential for success.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States, 424 F.3d 1254 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States, 424 F.3d 1254 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “” 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 . Prior to 1998, C & S Industrial Supply Co.”
Brent Berry v. Native Am. Servs. Corp., 109 F.4th 1297 (11th Cir. 2024). “§ 636 (j)(11)(E)–(F); 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 . A business is “small” if it meets the size stand- ards in 13 C.”
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 965 F. Supp. 1556 (D. Colo. 1997). “” Adarand notes the regulations implementing the SBA are found at 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 et seq. (1996), 48 C.”
McKing Consulting Corp. v. United States, 78 Fed. Cl. 715 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “” 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 (2007). . FAR Part 7 provides policy for acquisition planning and market research for all federal government acquisitions.”
Rothe Dev., Inc. v. Dep't of Def., 107 F. Supp. 3d 183 (D.D.C. 2015). “§ 121 , see 13 C.F.R. §§ 124.101 , 124.102; (2) demonstrate them business’s potential to succeed, see id.”
Kawa v. United States, 77 Fed. Cl. 294 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “13 C.F.R. § 124.101 (2007). On April 30, 1999, pre-award Contracting Officer (“CO”) Lu Ann Bocsy forwarded a copy of solicitation number SP050-99-Q-5778 to Capital City, requesting a quote for certain hose assemblies.”
Dynalantic Corp. v. United States Dep't of Def., 885 F. Supp. 2d 237 (D.D.C. 2012). “§§ 636 (j)(ll)(E) & (F); 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 . A business qualifies as “small” if it meets the standards set forth in 13 C.”
Cognitive Prof'l Servs. Inc. v. U.S. Small Bus. Admin., 254 F. Supp. 3d 22 (D.D.C. 2017). “” 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 ; see also 15 U.S.C. § 637 (a)(4)(A), (a)(4)(B), (a)(5), (a)(6)(A), (a)(7)(A).”
Info. Sys. & Networks Corp. v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 336 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “(quoting 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 ); Chapman Law Firm v.”
Ardmore Consulting Grp., Inc. v. Contreras-Sweet, 118 F. Supp. 3d 388 (D.D.C. 2015). “See 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 . Because it has failed to do so, its alleged connections with SRM Group have no bearing on its ultimate eligibility.”
Desa Grp., Inc. v. U.S. Small Bus. Admin., 190 F. Supp. 3d 61 (D.D.C. 2016). “” 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 . A non-disadvantaged entity or individual may be found to control a business, however, when “[bjusiness relationships exist with non-disadvantaged individuals or entities which cause such dependence that the applicant or Participant cannot exercise…”
NCLN20, Inc. v. United States, 99 Fed. Cl. 734 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “§ 637 (a)(1)(C) (2006); see also 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 (2011) (a qualifying small business is one "owned and controlled by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals who are of good character and citizens of and residing in the United States, and [that]…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.