C.F.R. » Title 13 » CHAPTER I—SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION › PART 124—8(a) BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS STATUS DETERMINATIONS › Subpart A—8(a) Business Development

13 C.F.R. § 124.101

What are the basic requirements a concern must meet for the 8(a) BD program?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Generally, a concern meets the basic requirements for admission to the 8(a) BD program if it is a small business which is unconditionally owned and controlled by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals who are of good character and citizens of and residing in the United States, and which demonstrates potential for success.

[76 FR 8254, Feb. 11, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States (2005) cafc “” 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 . Prior to 1998, C & S Industrial Supply Co.”
Brent Berry v. Native American Services Corporation (2024) ca11 · cites it 2× “§ 636 (j)(11)(E)–(F); 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 . A business is “small” if it meets the size stand- ards in 13 C.”
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena (1997) cod · cites it 2× “” Adarand notes the regulations implementing the SBA are found at 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 et seq. (1996), 48 C.”
McKing Consulting Corp. v. United States (2007) uscfc “” 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 (2007). . FAR Part 7 provides policy for acquisition planning and market research for all federal government acquisitions.”
Rothe Development, Inc. v. Department of Defense (2015) dcd “§ 121 , see 13 C.F.R. §§ 124.101 , 124.102; (2) demonstrate them business’s potential to succeed, see id.”
Kawa v. United States (2007) uscfc “13 C.F.R. § 124.101 (2007). On April 30, 1999, pre-award Contracting Officer (“CO”) Lu Ann Bocsy forwarded a copy of solicitation number SP050-99-Q-5778 to Capital City, requesting a quote for certain hose assemblies.”
Dynalantic Corp. v. United States Department of Defense (2012) dcd “§§ 636 (j)(ll)(E) & (F); 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 . A business qualifies as “small” if it meets the standards set forth in 13 C.”
Cognitive Professional Services Inc. v. U.S. Small Business Administration (2017) dcd · cites it 2× “” 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 ; see also 15 U.S.C. § 637 (a)(4)(A), (a)(4)(B), (a)(5), (a)(6)(A), (a)(7)(A).”
Information Systems & Networks Corp. v. United States (2005) uscfc “(quoting 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 ); Chapman Law Firm v.”
Ardmore Consulting Group, Inc. v. Contreras-Sweet (2015) dcd “See 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 . Because it has failed to do so, its alleged connections with SRM Group have no bearing on its ultimate eligibility.”
Desa Group, Inc. v. U.S. Small Business Administration (2016) dcd “” 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 . A non-disadvantaged entity or individual may be found to control a business, however, when “[bjusiness relationships exist with non-disadvantaged individuals or entities which cause such dependence that the applicant or Participant cannot exercise…”
NCLN20, Inc. v. United States (2011) uscfc “§ 637 (a)(1)(C) (2006); see also 13 C.F.R. § 124.101 (2011) (a qualifying small business is one "owned and controlled by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals who are of good character and citizens of and residing in the United States, and [that]…”
Show all 23 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.