13 C.F.R. § 124.301

Voluntary withdrawal or voluntary early graduation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A Participant may voluntarily withdraw from the 8(a) BD program at any time prior to the expiration of its program term. Where a Participant has substantially achieved the goals and objectives set forth in its business plan, it may elect to voluntarily early graduate from the 8(a) BD program.

(b) To initiate withdrawal or early graduation from the 8(a) BD program, a Participant must notify its servicing SBA district office of its intent to do so in writing. Once the SBA servicing district office processes the request and the District Director recognizes the withdrawal or early graduation, the Participant is no longer eligible to receive any 8(a) BD program assistance.

[85 FR 66186, Oct. 16, 2020]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2024 · leading case: Ims, P.C. v. Aida Alvarez, Adm'r, United States Small Bus. Admin., 129 F.3d 618 (D.C. Cir. 1997).
Ims, P.C. v. Aida Alvarez, Adm'r, United States Small Bus. Admin., 129 F.3d 618 (D.C. Cir. 1997). · cites it 12× “See 13 C.F.R. § 124.301 (b)(8) (1987) (subsequently amended and renumbered 13 C.”
Data Transformation Corp. v. United States, 13 Cl. Ct. 165 (Ct. Cl. 1987). · cites it 3× “” 13 C.F.R. § 124.301 (b)(5) (1987). SBA selected Apoca for the AWIS procurement because of its specific self-marketing efforts for placement of the AWIS requirement in the section 8(a) program.”
Brent Berry v. Native Am. Servs. Corp., 109 F.4th 1297 (11th Cir. 2024). “, 13 C.F.R. § 124.301 (a) (“A Participant may voluntarily withdraw from the 8(a) BD program at any time prior to the expiration of its program term.”
Info. Sys. & Networks Corp. v. Abdnor, 687 F. Supp. 674 (D.D.C. 1988). · cites it 4× “301 (b)(5) (1982) provides that the “SBA is not required to make an award of any particular contract, and should it make an award, SBA is not required to award a contract to a particular 8(a) concern.” The above-mentioned regulation was not intended to confer substantive or…”
Louise Woerner & L. Woerner, Inc., D/B/A Hcr v. United States Small Bus. Admin., 934 F.2d 1277 (D.C. Cir. 1991). “13 C.F.R. § 124.301 (b). Once the SBA approves the plan, the participant is eligible to obtain only those contracts that carry a code included in its business plan.”
San Antonio Gen. Maint., Inc. v. Abnor, 691 F. Supp. 1462 (D.D.C. 1987). “The complaint first alleges that the SBA’s actions contravened 13 C.F.R. § 124.301 (b)(8)(iii) and (b)(8)(iv)(B), which required the SBA to make a number of findings with respect to the adverse impact upon SAGM before retaining the contract within the 2[8](a) program.”
Concrete Tie of San Diego, Inc. v. Liberty Constr., Inc., 107 F.3d 1368 (9th Cir. 1997). “” 13 C.F.R. § 124.301 (b)(5) (1988). Not only is Liberty’s argument unsupported by the cited statutory language, it is flatly inconsistent with the statute’s pricing provision.”
IMS PC v. Alvarez, Aida (D.C. Cir. 1997). “The district court rejected IMS's claims, noting that "the reading of 13 C.F.R. 124.301 (1987) and the language therein is exclusive language.”
Woerner v. United States Small Bus. Admin., 934 F.2d 1277 (D.C. Cir. 1991). “13 C.F.R. § 124.301 (b). Once the SBA approves the plan, the participant is eligible to obtain only those contracts that carry a code included in its business plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.