14 C.F.R. § 105.1

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, this part prescribes rules governing parachute operations conducted in the United States.

(b) This part does not apply to a parachute operation conducted—

(1) In response to an in-flight emergency, or

(2) To meet an emergency on the surface when it is conducted at the direction or with the approval of an agency of the United States, or of a State, Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, or a possession of the United States, or an agency or political subdivision thereof.

(c) Sections 105.5, 105.9, 105.13, 105.15, 105.17, 105.19 through 105.23, 105.25(a)(1) and 105.27 of this part do not apply to a parachute operation conducted by a member of an Armed Force—

(1) Over or within a restricted area when that area is under the control of an Armed Force.

(2) During military operations in uncontrolled airspace.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1989–1997 · leading case: Blue Sky Entertainment, Inc. v. Town of Gardiner
Blue Sky Entertainment, Inc. v. Town of Gardiner (1989) nynd · cites it 2× “” 14 C.F.R. § 105.1 . Even though Town Law 6 may not conflict with 14 C.”
City of Cleveland, Ohio v. City of Brook Park, Ohio (1995) ohnd “The court noted that 14 C.F.R. § 105.1 contains explicit regulations of parachute jumps, and that this reflects the FAA’s “pervasive [authority] in the realm of parachute jumping.”
United States v. Oxx (1997) utd “” 14 C.F.R. § 105.1 (b) (1996). Similarly, it does not appear that this regulation was intended to govern the purported activities of the defendants.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.