C.F.R. » Title 14 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER B—PROCEDURAL RULES › PART 13—INVESTIGATIVE AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES › Subpart B—Administrative Actions

14 C.F.R. § 13.11

Administrative disposition of certain violations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If, after an investigation, FAA personnel determine that an apparent violation of 49 U.S.C. subtitle VII, 49 U.S.C. chapter 51, or any rule, regulation, or order issued under those statutes, does not require legal enforcement action, an appropriate FAA official may take administrative action to address the apparent violation.

(b) An administrative action under this section does not constitute a formal adjudication of the matter, and may take the form of—

(1) A Warning Notice that recites available facts and information about the incident or condition and indicates that it may have been a violation; or

(2) A Letter of Correction that states the corrective action the apparent violator has taken or agrees to take. If the apparent violator does not complete the agreed corrective action, the FAA may take legal enforcement action.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1981–2011 · leading case: 5-State Helicopters, Inc. v. Cox, 146 S.W.3d 254 (Tex. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
5-State Helicopters, Inc. v. Cox, 146 S.W.3d 254 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “” 14 C.F.R. § 13.11 (a). Such administrative actions include issuing a warning notice to the alleged violator.”
Aviation Charter, Inc. v. Aviation Rsch. Grp./us Joseph Moeggenberg, 416 F.3d 864 (8th Cir. 2005). “The FAA makes a clear distinction between “legal enforcement actions” and “administration actions,” see 14 C.F.R. § 13.11 (2005), and it is evident from ARGUS’s report that, with one exception, the EIS details fell into the latter category.”
Menard v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 548 F.3d 353 (5th Cir. 2008). “See 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.11 , 91.13(a). The Menards also contacted their Congressman, who wrote to the FAA on their behalf.”
De Feyter v. FAA, 2011 DNH 049 (D.N.H. 2011). “De Feyter argues that the FAA’s written Compliance and Enforcement Program supplies such a standard.”
5-State Helicopters, Inc. & Bradford Scott LaDue & John E. Cox & Brian Novickis v. John E. Cox & Brian Novickis & 5-State Helicopters, Inc. & Bradford Scott LaDue (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “” 14 C.F.R. § 13.11 (a). Such administrative actions include issuing a warning notice to the alleged violator.”
Aviation Charter v. Aviation Rsch. (8th Cir. 2005). “The FAA makes a clear distinction between “legal enforcement actions” and “administration actions,” see 14 C.F.R. § 13.11 (2005), and it is evident from ARGUS’s report that, with one exception, the EIS details fell into the latter category.”
Rockdale Indus., Inc. v. United States, 518 F. Supp. 588 (N.D. Ga. 1981). “14 C.F.R. § 13.11 provides for various means by which administrative disposition of violations may be carried out.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.