(a) Unless sooner terminated under paragraph (b) of this section, a designation as an Aviation Medical Examiner or as a Flight Standards or Aircraft Certification Service Designated Representative as described in §§ 183.21, 183.23, 183.25, 183.27, 183.29, 183.31, or 183.33 is effective until the expiration date shown on the document granting the authorization.
(b) A designation made under this subpart terminates:
(1) Upon the written request of the representative;
(2) Upon the written request of the employer in any case in which the recommendation of the employer is required for the designation;
(3) Upon the representative being separated from the employment of the employer who recommended him or her for certification;
(4) Upon a finding by the Administrator that the representative has not properly performed his or her duties under the designation;
(5) Upon the assistance of the representative being no longer needed by the Administrator; or
(6) For any reason the Administrator considers appropriate.
[Docket FAA-2007-27812, 73 FR 43066, July 24, 2008]
Notes of Decisions
Steenholdt v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 314 F.3d 633 (D.C. Cir. 2003).
· cites it 4× “14 C.F.R. § 183.15 . The FAA evaluates a DER’s performance annually to determine whether that DER is performing at a satisfactory level.”
Carlos Lopez v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 318 F.3d 242 (D.C. Cir. 2003).
· cites it 4× “14 C.F.R. § 183.15 (b). The Administrator may rescind such appointments, or choose not to renew them, at “any time for any reason the Administrator considers appropriate.”
Green v. Brantley, 719 F. Supp. 1570 (N.D. Ga. 1989).
· cites it 9× “See 14 C.F.R. § 183.15 (a). However, 14 C.F.R.”
White v. Franklin, 637 F. Supp. 601 (N.D. Miss. 1986).
· cites it 5× “-15(a); however, 14 C.F.R. § 183.15 (d) enumerates six circumstances under which a designation may be terminated during its one-year duration.”
Burdue v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 774 F.3d 1076 (6th Cir. 2014).
· cites it 2× “Burdue’s termination letter indicated that the revocation was being made pursuant to both the “for cause” provision of 14 C.F.R. § 183.15 (b)(4) and the discretionary-revocation provision of 14 C.”
Alfred M. Adams v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 1 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 1993).
· cites it 2× “§ 1355(a) (1988); 14 C.F.R. § 183.15 (1993). 2 *957 Therefore, we hold that we lack jurisdiction to review the FAA administrator’s decision not to renew Adams’ Pilot Examiner Designation.”
Walter Bradshaw v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 8 F.4th 1215 (11th Cir. 2021).
· cites it 2× “5 § 3, 13-465; see also 14 C.F.R. § 183.15 (b)(6). DPEs must meet the standards set forth in Chapter 7 of FAA Order 8900.”
Ligon v. LaHood, 614 F.3d 150 (5th Cir. 2010).
“§ 44702 (d)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 183.15 (b). DER certificates are renewed annually.”
Joseph Sheble, III v. Michael Huerta, 755 F.3d 954 (D.C. Cir. 2014).
“§ 44702 (d)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 183.15 (b)(6). The FAA, in conjunction with the local Flight Standards District Office, evaluates Designated Pilot Examiners according to procedures set forth in FAA Order 8900.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.