14 C.F.R. § 203.5

Compliance as condition on operations in air transportation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

It shall be a condition on the authority of all direct U.S. and foreign carriers to operate in air transportation that they have and maintain in effect and on file with the Department a signed counterpart of Agreement 18900, and a tariff (for those carriers otherwise generally required to file tariffs) that includes its provisions, as required by this subpart. Notwithstanding any failure to file that counterpart and such tariff, any such air carrier or foreign air carrier issued license authority (including exemptions) by the Department or operating in air transportation shall be deemed to have agreed to the provisions of Agreement 18900 as fully as if that air carrier or foreign air carrier had in fact filed a properly executed counterpart to that Agreement and tariff.

[ER-1324, 48 FR 8044, Feb. 25, 1983, as amended by Doc. No. 47939, 57 FR 40100, Sept. 2, 1992]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: Hardy v. Scandinavian Airline Sys, 117 F.4th 252 (5th Cir. 2024).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hardy v. Scandinavian Airline Sys, 117 F.4th 252 (5th Cir. 2024). “See also 14 C.F.R. § 203.5 ; Montreal Con- vention Article 55(1)(e) (stating that “[t]his Convention shall prevail over any rules which apply to international carriage by air,” including Montreal Protocol No.”

Price v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, 107 F. Supp. 2d 1365 (N.D. Ga. 2000). “14 C.F.R. § 203.5 (2000); see also 14 C.F.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.