(a) If a person holds the TC for a product and alters that product by introducing a major change in type design that does not require an application for a new TC under § 21.19, that person must apply to the FAA either for an STC, or to amend the original type certificate under subpart D of this part.
(b) If a person does not hold the TC for a product and alters that product by introducing a major change in type design that does not require an application for a new TC under § 21.19, that person must apply to the FAA for an STC.
(c) The application for an STC must be made in the form and manner prescribed by the FAA.
[Doc. No. FAA-2006-25877, Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53387, Oct. 16, 2009; Doc. No. FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 21-101, 83 FR 9169, Mar. 5, 2018]
Notes of Decisions
Jill Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp, 907 F.3d 701 (3d Cir. 2018).
“14 C.F.R. § 21.113 . 14 C.F.R. § 21.97 . As correctly summarized in the Majority opinion, additional FAA regulations govern changes to airplane parts made by aftermarket parts manufacturers who hold an FAA-issued PMA.”
Mary Riggs v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc., 939 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2019).
“§ 44704 (b)(1) (emphasis added); see also 14 C.F.R. § 21.113 . Like an ordinary type certificate, a supplemental certificate authorizes the holder then to seek production and airworthiness certificates for the modified design.”
Bailey v. Comm'r, 103 T.C.M. 1499 (Tax Ct. 2012).
· cites it 2× “Vasco testified, the process for obtaining a "multi-use" supplemental type certificate to modify an aircraft design is considerably more difficult and expensive than obtaining a "one-off" field approval to modify a single aircraft.”
Waymire v. United States, 629 F. Supp. 1396 (D. Kan. 1986).
“The applicant is responsible for conducting the inspections and tests necessary to show that the alterations in the design type comply with the regulations.”
Herrick v. Garvey, 200 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (D. Wyo. 2000).
“14 CFR § 21.113 (1983). To obtain this supplemental type certificate, the applicant must show the FAA that the altered aircraft meets all applicable airworthiness requirements.”
Alt. Aviation Servs., Inc. v. Meggitt (UK) Ltd., 207 F. App'x 506 (6th Cir. 2006).
“See 14 C.F.R. § 21.113 (“Any person who alters a product by introducing a major change in type design, not great enough to require a new application for a type certificate under § 21.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.