14 C.F.R. § 254.5

Notice requirement

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In any flight segment using large aircraft, or on any flight segment that is included on the same ticket as another flight segment that uses large aircraft, an air carrier shall provide to passengers, by conspicuous written material included on or with its ticket, either:

(a) Notice of any monetary limitation on its baggage liability to passengers; or

(b) The following notice: “Federal rules require any limit on an airline's baggage liability to be at least $4,700 per passenger.”

[72 FR 3943, Jan. 29, 2007, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2008-0332, 73 FR 70592, Nov. 21, 2008; 78 FR 14914, Mar. 8, 2013; 80 FR 30147, May 27, 2015; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2020-0251, 86 FR 2539, Jan. 13, 2021; 89 FR 84819, Oct. 24, 2024]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2024 · leading case: Am. Samoa Gov't ex rel. Uikirifi v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 10 Am. Samoa 2d 31 (1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Am. Samoa Gov't ex rel. Uikirifi v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 10 Am. Samoa 2d 31 (1989). · cites it 4× “According to 14 C.F.R. § 254.5 Hawaiian must also: provide to passengers, by conspicuous written material included on or with its ticket, either: (a) Notice of any monetary limitation on its baggage liability to passengers; or (b) The following notice: "Federal rules require any…”

Hawaiian Airlines v. Am. Samoa Gov't ex rel. Uikirifi, 13 Am. Samoa 2d 5 (1989). · cites it 4× “" 14 C.F.R. § 254.5 (b) (1984).- But this is not the only language which will suffice.”

CF Dominica Cigars, Inc. & Ruben Ortiz v. Am. Airlines, Inc. (Fla. 4th DCA 2024). “We are not liable for any incidental, punitive or special damages that result from lost, damaged or delayed bags including damages for lost revenue or business interruption.”

Mauseth v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 24 F. App'x 809 (9th Cir. 2001). “We reject Mauseth’s argument that federal regulations codified at 14 C.F.R. § 254.5 preempt the federal common law in this area.”

— 14 C.F.R. § 254.5(b) — 1 case

Hawaiian Airlines v. Am. Samoa Gov't ex rel. Uikirifi, 13 Am. Samoa 2d 5 (1989). “" 14 C.F.R. § 254.5 (b) (1984).- But this is not the only language which will suffice.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.