14 C.F.R. § 43.5
Approval for return to service after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration
No person may approve for return to service any aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, or appliance, that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless—
(a) The maintenance record entry required by § 43.9 or § 43.11, as appropriate, has been made;
(b) The repair or alteration form authorized by or furnished by the Administrator has been executed in a manner prescribed by the Administrator; and
(c) If a repair or an alteration results in any change in the aircraft operating limitations or flight data contained in the approved aircraft flight manual, those operating limitations or flight data are appropriately revised and set forth as prescribed in § 91.9 of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1977–2017 · leading case: Indem. Ins. Co. of North Am. v. Am. Aviation, Inc., 344 F.3d 1136 (11th Cir. 2003).
Indem. Ins. Co. of North Am. v. Am. Aviation, Inc., 344 F.3d 1136 (11th Cir. 2003). “See 14 C.F.R. § 43.5 . According to appellants, an aircraft owner relies on these records to determine, among other things, if the required maintenance has been performed, if *1138 the aircraft can be returned to service, and when the next maintenance is scheduled.”
Robert Edward Olsen v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 14 F.3d 471 (9th Cir. 1994). “The ALJ also found that Olsen had violated regulations prohibiting the return to service of an aircraft without proper maintenance records, see 14 C.F.R. § 43.5 (a), and proscribing minimum maintenance standards for aircraft repair, see id.”
U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. Est. of John Charles Earley, 680 F. App'x 767 (10th Cir. 2017). “See 14 C.F.R. §§ 43.5 , 43.9. For this particular conversion, the *771 FAA indicated that its “approval is valid only if [the] aircraft is placarded to be flown from [the forward] seat only.”
United States v. Airways Serv., Inc., 429 F. Supp. 843 (N.D. Iowa 1977). “73-21-2; (b) Defendant Lee is in violation of 14 CFR § 43.5 (a)(2) for failure to make a maintenance record entry required by § 43.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.