14 C.F.R. § 60.2

Applicability of sponsor rules to persons who are not sponsors and who are engaged in certain unauthorized activities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The rules of this part that are directed to a sponsor of an FSTD also apply to any person who uses or causes the use of an FSTD when—

(1) That person knows that the FSTD does not have an FAA-approved sponsor; and

(2) The use of the FSTD by that person is nonetheless claimed for purposes of meeting any requirement of this chapter or that person knows or should have known that the person's acts or omissions would cause another person to mistakenly credit use of the FSTD for purposes of meeting any requirement of this chapter.

(b) A situation in which paragraph (a) of this section would not apply to a person would be when each of the following conditions are met:

(1) The person sold or leased the FSTD and merely represented to the purchaser or lessee that the FSTD is in a condition in which it should be able to obtain FAA approval and qualification under this part;

(2) The person does not falsely claim to be the FAA-approved sponsor for the FSTD;

(3) The person does not falsely make representations that someone else is the FAA-approved sponsor of the FSTD at a time when that other person is not the FAA-approved sponsor of the FSTD; and

(4) The person's acts or omissions do not cause another person to detrimentally rely on such acts or omissions for the mistaken conclusion that the FSTD is FAA-approved and qualified under this part at the time the FSTD is sold or leased.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 12 cases, 1958–1987 · leading case: United States v. Schultetus

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Schultetus (1960) ca5 “” 14 C.F.R. § 60.2 . The airport traffic control procedures have been thus summarized, *327 “All aeronautical activities at any airport, or landing area, and all flying of aircraft departing from or arriving at an airport which constitutes a control area or control zone, must be…”

Prashker v. Beech Aircraft Corp. (1958) ca3 “…resident; the decedent was a resident of Pennsylvania. . 14 C.F.R. 43.65 and 43.68. . 14 C.F.R. 60.30 and 60.31. . 14 C.F.R. 60.2.”

Wasilko v. United States (1967) ohnd “Plaintiff’s decedent, Pilot Wasilko, flying under VFR was in command of the aircraft, was directly responsible for its operation, and had final authority as to operation of the aircraft.”

Leonard J. Specht v. Civil Aeronautics Board (1958) ca8 “-360 and 14 C.F.R. § 60.2 , supra. If an emergency actually existed which justified Captain Specht’s departure from his assigned altitude and he followed proper procedures in doing so, then there was no violation of the two sections referred to.”

Rowe v. United States (1964) pawd “14 C.F.R. § 60.2 provided: “§ 60.2. Authority of the pilot.”

Gill v. United States (1970) ca5 “The regulations, 14 C.F.R. § 60.2 (1963) provided: “The pilot in command of the aircraft shall be directly responsible for its operation and shall have final authority as to operation of the aircraft.”

Kullberg v. United States (1964) pawd “14 C.F.R. § 60.2 provided: “§ 60.2 Authority of the pilot.”

Haley v. United States (1987) ncwd · cites it 2× “’ ” (Citing 14 C.F.R. § 60.2 ) The North Carolina court further notes that the quoted federal regulation is made applicable to all flights in North Carolina by state statute (citing NCGS § 63-20).”

Prashker v. Beech Aircraft Corporation (1958) ca3 “…resident; the decedent was a resident of Pennsylvania 2 14 C.F.R. 43.65 and 43.68 3 14 C.F.R. 60.30 and 60.31 4 14 C.F.R. 60.2”

Stratmore v. United States (1962) njd “326, the Court of Appeals quoted from the Civil Air Regulations of the Civil Aeronautics Board, as follows: “ ‘The pilot in command of the aircraft shall be directly responsible for its operation and shall have final authority as to operation of the aircraft’ ”, citing 14 C.F.R.…”

United States v. Joanne Mae Schultetus, a Widow, Individually and as Next Friend of Douglas Jay Schultetus, a Minor, Uni (1960) ca5 “' 14 C.F.R. 60.2. The airport traffic control procedures have been thus summarized,'All aeronautical activities at any airport, or landing area, and all flying of aircraft departing from or arriving at an airport which constitutes a control area or control zone, must be…”

Gale S. Gill, Individually and as Guardian of Her Minor Children, and Louis B. Barlow, Individually and as Guardian of H (1970) ca3 “We need not reach this issue because of our decision on the issue of negligent furnishing of data by Waco 4 The regulations, 14 C.F.R. 60.2 (1963) provided: 'The pilot in command of the aircraft shall be directly responsible for its operation and shall have final authority as to…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.