C.F.R. » Title 16 » CHAPTER II—CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER B—CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY ACT REGULATIONS › PART 1203—SAFETY STANDARD FOR BICYCLE HELMETS › Subpart B—Certification

16 C.F.R. § 1203.32

Definitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The following definitions shall apply to this subpart:

(a) Foreign manufacturer means an entity that manufactured a bicycle helmet outside the United States, as defined in 15 2052(a)(10) and (14).

(b) Manufacturer means the entity that either manufactured a helmet in the United States or imported a helmet manufactured outside the United States.

(c) Private labeler means an owner of a brand or trademark that is used on a bicycle helmet subject to the standard and that is not the brand or trademark of the manufacturer of the bicycle helmet, provided the owner of the brand or trademark caused, authorized, or approved its use.

(d) Production lot means a quantity of bicycle helmets from which certain bicycle helmets are selected for testing prior to certifying the lot. All bicycle helmets in a lot must be essentially identical in those design, construction, and material features that relate to the ability of a bicycle helmet to comply with the standard.

(e) Reasonable testing program means any tests which are identical or equivalent to, or more stringent than, the tests defined in the standard and which are performed on one or more bicycle helmets selected from the production lot to determine whether there is reasonable assurance that all of the bicycle helmets in that lot comply with the requirements of the standard.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2021 · leading case: Grant M. Williams v. Pac. Cycle, Inc., 661 F. App'x 716 (11th Cir. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Grant M. Williams v. Pac. Cycle, Inc., 661 F. App'x 716 (11th Cir. 2016). “” See 16 C.F.R. § 1203.32 (b). However, the definition of a "manufacturer” *720 under federal regulations does not govern the definition under Georgia law for strict liability purposes.”
Moreno v. Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. (D. Colo. 2021). “” 16 C.F.R. 1203.32(e). 2. Preemption of State Standards and Requirements The CPSA addresses the issue of state standards “which are designed to deal with the same risk of injury associated with [the federal] consumer product [safety standard].”
— 16 C.F.R. § 1203.32(e) — 1 case
Moreno v. Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. (D. Colo. 2021). “” 16 C.F.R. 1203.32(e). 2. Preemption of State Standards and Requirements The CPSA addresses the issue of state standards “which are designed to deal with the same risk of injury associated with [the federal] consumer product [safety standard].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.