16 C.F.R. § 1630.2
Scope and application
(a) This Standard provides a test method to determine the surface flammability of carpets and rugs when exposed to a standard small source of ignition under carefully prescribed draft-protected conditions. It is applicable to all types of carpets and rugs used as floor covering materials regardless of their method of fabrication or whether they are made of natural or synthetic fibers or films, or combinations of or substitutes for these.
(b) One of a kind, carpet or rug, such as an antique, an Oriental, or a hide, may be excluded from testing under this Standard pursuant to conditions established by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2024 · leading case: Clark v. Sch. Dist. Five of Lexington & Richland Counties, 247 F. Supp. 3d 734 (D.S.C. 2017).
Clark v. Sch. Dist. Five of Lexington & Richland Counties, 247 F. Supp. 3d 734 (D.S.C. 2017). “16 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (o )(l)(ii), (iii). A modification or adjustment that enables an individual to perform the essential functions of the job is one category of reasonable accommodation; the regulation also acknowledges a separate category—a modification or adjustment that…”
Reinhart v. Birmingham, City of (E.D. Mich. 2024). “at 17 (citing 16 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (j)(1)(vi)).9 But the only evidence Reinhart submits to support this theory is his deposition testimony where he purports to quote his doctor as stating: “If you don’t do Pilates, you are not going to be able to walk.”
Levesy v. Scolese (E.D. Va. 2023). “30, 2018) (citing 16 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (o)). For these reasons, the Court finds that a reasonable juror could not conclude that Plaintiff has established a prima facie failure to accommodate case under the Rehabilitation Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.