17 C.F.R. § 10.93

Obtaining default order

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

When a respondent has failed to (a) file an answer as provided in § 10.23 of these rules or (b) failed to appear or file a notice of appearance as provided in § 10.62 of these rules or (c) failed to file a statement under the shortened procedures as provided in § 10.92 of these rules, the Division of Enforcement may move the Administrative Law Judge to enter findings and conclusions and a default order against that respondent based upon the matters set forth in the complaint, which shall be deemed to be true for purposes of this determination.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1984–1984 · leading case: Strobl v. New York Mercantile Exch., 590 F. Supp. 875 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).
Strobl v. New York Mercantile Exch., 590 F. Supp. 875 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). · cites it 2× “17 C.F.R. § 10.93 (1983). That section provides that when a respondent in a Commodity Futures Trading Commission hearing before an AU fails to appear or file a notice of appearance, the AU may “enter findings and conclusions and a default order against that respondent based upon…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.