17 C.F.R. § 202.5

Enforcement activities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Where, from complaints received from members of the public, communications from Federal or State agencies, examination of filings made with the Commission, or otherwise, it appears that there may be violation of the acts administered by the Commission or the rules or regulations thereunder, a preliminary investigation is generally made. In such preliminary investigation no process is issued or testimony compelled. The Commission may, in its discretion, make such formal investigations and authorize the use of process as it deems necessary to determine whether any person has violated, is violating, or is about to violate any provision of the federal securities laws or the rules of a self-regulatory organization of which the person is a member or participant. Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, the investigation or examination is non-public and the reports thereon are for staff and Commission use only.

(b) After investigation or otherwise the Commission may in its discretion take one or more of the following actions: Institution of administrative proceedings looking to the imposition of remedial sanctions, initiation of injunctive proceedings in the courts, and, in the case of a willful violation, reference of the matter to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. The Commission may also, on some occasions, refer the matter to, or grant requests for access to its files made by, domestic and foreign governmental authorities or foreign securities authorities, self-regulatory organizations such as stock exchanges or the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., and other persons or entities.

(c) Persons who become involved in preliminary or formal investigations may, on their own initiative, submit a written statement to the Commission setting forth their interests and position in regard to the subject matter of the investigation. Upon request, the staff, in its discretion, may advise such persons of the general nature of the investigation, including the indicated violations as they pertain to them, and the amount of time that may be available for preparing and submitting a statement prior to the presentation of a staff recommendation to the Commission for the commencement of an administrative or injunction proceeding. Submissions by interested persons should be forwarded to the appropriate Division Director or Regional Director with a copy to the staff members conducting the investigation and should be clearly referenced to the specific investigation to which they relate. In the event a recommendation for the commencement of an enforcement proceeding is presented by the staff, any submissions by interested persons will be forwarded to the Commission in conjunction with the staff memorandum.

(d) In instances where the staff has concluded its investigation of a particular matter and has determined that it will not recommend the commencement of an enforcement proceeding against a person, the staff, in its discretion, may advise the party that its formal investigation has been terminated. Such advice if given must in no way be construed as indicating that the party has been exonerated or that no action may ultimately result from the staff's investigation of the particular matter.

(e) [Reserved]

(f) In the course of the Commission's investigations, civil lawsuits, and administrative proceedings, the staff, with appropriate authorization, may discuss with persons involved the disposition of such matters by consent, by settlement, or in some other manner. It is the policy of the Commission, however, that the disposition of any such matter may not, expressly or impliedly, extend to any criminal charges that have been, or may be, brought against any such person or any recommendation with respect thereto. Accordingly, any person involved in an enforcement matter before the Commission who consents, or agrees to consent, to any judgment or order does so solely for the purpose of resolving the claims against him in that investigative, civil, or administrative matter and not for the purpose of resolving any criminal charges that have been, or might be, brought against him. This policy reflects the fact that neither the Commission nor its staff has the authority or responsibility for instituting, conducting, settling, or otherwise disposing of criminal proceedings. That authority and responsibility are vested in the Attorney General and representatives of the Department of Justice.

[25 FR 6736, July 15, 1960, as amended at 37 FR 23829, Nov. 9, 1972; 37 FR 25224, Nov. 29, 1972; 44 FR 50835, Aug. 30, 1979; 46 FR 47532, Sept. 29, 1981; 47 FR 26822, June 22, 1982; 54 FR 24332, June 7, 1989; 59 FR 5945, Feb. 9, 1994; 73 FR 32227, June 5, 2008; 91 FR 29896, May 21, 2026]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 70 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case: Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Thompson, 238 F. Supp. 3d 575 (S.D.N.Y. 2017).
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Thompson, 238 F. Supp. 3d 575 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). · cites it 6× “) 17 C.F.R. § 202.5 (f) provides that an individual who consents to settle an SEC enforcement action "does so solely for the purpose of resolving the claims against him in that investigative, civil, or administrative matter and not for the purpose of resolving any criminal…”
Cato Inst. v. SEC, 4 F.4th 91 (D.C. Cir. 2021). · cites it 5× “29, 1972) (codified at 17 C.F.R. § 202.5 (e)). Cato contends that the SEC has applied this policy to prohibit defendants from denying any allegations made against them by the SEC, including allegations to which their consent decree did not require them to admit.”
Dichter-Mad Fam. Partners, LLP v. United States, 707 F. Supp. 2d 1016 (C.D. Cal. 2010). · cites it 5× “5 : Where, from complaints received from members of the public, communications from Federal or State agencies, examination of filings made with the Commission, or otherwise, it appears that there may be violation of the acts administered by the Commission or the rules or…”
Wellman v. Dickinson, 79 F.R.D. 341 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). · cites it 6× “Second is the claim that the SEC violated the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, as well as its own regulations, see 17 C.F.R. § 202.5 (c), by denying the Defendants an opportunity to present to the Commission their version of the facts and appli *349 cable law…”
First Mortg. Corp. v. United States, 961 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2020). · cites it 2× “to make, amend, and rescind such rules and regulations as may be necessary”); 17 C.F.R. § 202.5 (f) (explaining that effect as judgments after a trial on the merits” (citation omitted)).”
In re Lions Gate Ent. Corp. Sec. Litig., 165 F. Supp. 3d 1 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “2012); 17 C.F.R. § 202.5 . (“Persons who become involved in preliminary or formal investigations may, on their own initiative, submit a written statement to the Commission setting forth their interests and position in regard to the subject matter of the investigation.”
Carlos Zelaya v. United States, 781 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2015). “”); 17 C.F.R. § 202.5 (a) ("The Commission may, in its discretion, make such formal investigations .”
United States v. Frank Quattrone, 441 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 2006). “See 17 C.F.R. § 202.5 (a). It cannot issue process or take testimony during the informal stage of the investigation.”
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,552 United States of Am. v. Douglas P. Fields, Frederick M. Friedman, Peter S. Davis, Alan E. Sandberg, Anderic Berge, 592 F.2d 638 (2d Cir. 1979). · cites it 2× “17 C.F.R. § 202.5 (a) (1977). 12 As for the criminal reference procedure, whether formal or informal, it is authorized by statute and by Commission rules and regulations.”
Molchatsky v. United States, 778 F. Supp. 2d 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). · cites it 2× “17 C.F.R. § 202.5 (a) (2010) (emphasis supplied).”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Loving Spirit Found. Inc., 392 F.3d 486 (D.C. Cir. 2004). “i) enter a general appearance; (ii) consent to the Court’s jurisdiction over [it] and the subject matter of this action and waive any objections as to venue; (iii) consent to entry of the Final Judgment; (iv) waive findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (v) waive any right…”
SEC v. Romeril, 15 F.4th 166 (2d Cir. 2021). “' 17 C.F.R. § 202.5 . In compliance with this policy, Defendant agrees not to take any action or to make or permit to be made any public statement denying, directly or indirectly, any allegation in the complaint or creating the impression that the complaint is without factual…”
— 17 C.F.R. § 202.5(b) — 1 case
United States v. Perraud, 672 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (S.D. Fla. 2009).
— 17 C.F.R. § 202.5(c) — 2 cases
— 17 C.F.R. § 202.5(e) — 3 cases
SEC v. Novinger, 40 F.4th 297 (5th Cir. 2022).
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Nat'l Student Mktg. Corp., 68 F.R.D. 157 (D.D.C. 1975).
United States v. Perraud, 672 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (S.D. Fla. 2009).
— 17 C.F.R. § 202.5(f) — 5 cases
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Loving Spirit Found. Inc., 392 F.3d 486 (D.C. Cir. 2004). “i) enter a general appearance; (ii) consent to the Court’s jurisdiction over [it] and the subject matter of this action and waive any objections as to venue; (iii) consent to entry of the Final Judgment; (iv) waive findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (v) waive any right…”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Thompson, 238 F. Supp. 3d 575 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). “) 17 C.F.R. § 202.5 (f) provides that an individual who consents to settle an SEC enforcement action "does so solely for the purpose of resolving the claims against him in that investigative, civil, or administrative matter and not for the purpose of resolving any criminal…”
United States v. Perraud, 672 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (S.D. Fla. 2009).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.