17 C.F.R. § 229.406

(Item 406) Code of ethics

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Disclose whether the registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. If the registrant has not adopted such a code of ethics, explain why it has not done so.

(b) For purposes of this Item 406, the term code of ethics means written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

(1) Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

(2) Full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that a registrant files with, or submits to, the Commission and in other public communications made by the registrant;

(3) Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

(4) The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and

(5) Accountability for adherence to the code.

(c) The registrant must:

(1) File with the Commission a copy of its code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, as an exhibit to its annual report;

(2) Post the text of such code of ethics on its Internet website and disclose, in its annual report, its Internet address and the fact that it has posted such code of ethics on its Internet Web site; or

(3) Undertake in its annual report filed with the Commission to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of such code of ethics and explain the manner in which such request may be made.

(d) If the registrant intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of its code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions and that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of this Item by posting such information on its internet website, disclose the registrant's internet address and such intention.

Instructions to Item 406. 1. A registrant may have separate codes of ethics for different types of officers. Furthermore, a code of ethics within the meaning of paragraph (b) of this Item may be a portion of a broader document that addresses additional topics or that applies to more persons than those specified in paragraph (a). In satisfying the requirements of paragraph (c), a registrant need only file, post or provide the portions of a broader document that constitutes a code of ethics as defined in paragraph (b) and that apply to the persons specified in paragraph (a).

2. If a registrant elects to satisfy paragraph (c) of this Item by posting its code of ethics on its website pursuant to paragraph (c)(2), the code of ethics must remain accessible on its Web site for as long as the registrant remains subject to the requirements of this Item and chooses to comply with this Item by posting its code on its Web site pursuant to paragraph (c)(2).

[68 FR 5127, Jan. 31, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 1594, Jan. 7, 2005; 83 FR 50211, Oct. 4, 2018]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2025 · leading case: Retail Wholesale & Dep't Store Union Local 338 Ret. Fund v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 845 F.3d 1268 (9th Cir. 2017).
Retail Wholesale & Dep't Store Union Local 338 Ret. Fund v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 845 F.3d 1268 (9th Cir. 2017). “17 C.F.R. § 229.406 (a). In fact, the ethical issues most relevant to this litigation—conflicts of interest, disclosure, internal handling of violations—are directly addressed by SEC regulations.”
Andropolis v. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., 505 F. Supp. 2d 662 (D. Colo. 2007). · cites it 2× “17 C.F.R. § 229.406 (a)-(b) (2006). Further, NASDAQ rules require its members adopt a code of conduct applicable to all officers and directors.”
City of Roseville Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Horizon Lines, Inc., 686 F. Supp. 2d 404 (D. Del. 2009). “17 C.F.R. § 229.406 . Were we to accept plaintiffs’ position, any company with a code of ethics in compliance with § 229.”
Dorin v. Exscientia P.L.C. (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2× “Exscientia’s Corporate Governance Documents Before going public, Exscientia adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the Code) as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) regulations and NASDAQ rules.”
Ferris v. Wynn Resorts Ltd. (D. Nev. 2020). “” (Wynn Resorts MTD at 10) (citing 17 C.F.R. § 229.406 (a), (c)); (see Wynn Resorts Reply 20 at 7, ECF No.”
Allegheny Cnty. Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Energy Transfer Lp (E.D. Pa. 2021). “”) (citing 17 C.F.R. § 229.406 ). To hold a company accountable for its code of ethics anytime an employee allegedly violated that code means a company “would be required to disclose all violations of that code or face liability under federal securities law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.