(a) Each broker must keep current in a correct, orderly, and itemized manner records of account reflecting all his financial transactions as a broker. He must keep and maintain on file copies of all his correspondence and other records relating to his customs business.
(b) Each broker must provide notification to the CBP Office of Information Technology Security Operations Center (CBP SOC) of any known breach of electronic or physical records relating to the broker's customs business. Notification must be electronically provided ([email protected]) within 72 hours of the discovery of the breach, including any known compromised importer identification numbers (see 19 CFR 24.5). Within ten (10) business days of the notification, a broker must electronically provide an updated list of any additional known compromised importer identification numbers. To the extent that additional information is subsequently discovered, the broker must electronically provide that information within 72 hours of discovery. Brokers may also call CBP SOC at a telephone number posted on CBP.gov with questions as to the reporting of the breach, if any guidance is needed.
(c) Each broker must comply with the provisions of this part and part 163 of this chapter when maintaining records that reflect on his transactions as a broker.
(d) Each broker must designate a knowledgeable employee as the party responsible for brokerage-wide recordkeeping requirements. Each broker must maintain accurate and current point of contact information in a CBP-authorized electronic data interchange (EDI) system. If a CBP-authorized EDI system is not available, then the information must be provided in writing to the processing Center.
[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63315, Oct. 18, 2022]
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Modes, Inc., 787 F. Supp. 1466 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1992).
· cites it 2× “§ 1508 ; 19 C.F.R. § 111.21 et seq. The Government should be placed in the same position that it would have occupied had the alleged misconduct not occurred.”
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, No. 4-10, 707 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2013).
“Customs Service sought to inspect McCoy's records "in accordance with regulations [ 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.21 et seq.] requiring customshouse brokers to maintain records of their business and allow access to them.”
Boynton v. United States, 517 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
“19 C.F.R. § 111.21 (a) states, in relevant part, that, “[e]ach broker must keep current in a correct, orderly, and itemized manner records of account reflecting all his financial transactions as a broker.”
Urbano v. United States, 967 F. Supp. 1322 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997).
“See 19 C.F.R. § 111.21 (1994) (requiring broker to maintain "records of account reflecting all his financial transactions as a broker”); 19 C.”
United States v. McCoy, 492 F. Supp. 540 (M.D. Fla. 1980).
“” 19 C.F.R. § 111.21 (1978). Other records which must be maintained are described in 19 C.”
O'Quinn v. United States, 100 F. Supp. 2d 1136 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2000).
· cites it 4× “For example, Defendants point to 19 C.F.R. § 111.21 (1997) to support their conclusion that choices (A) and (B) are incorrect.”
Twigger v. Schultz, 484 F.2d 856 (3rd Cir. 1973).
“21, Customs Regulations, as amended (19 CFR 111.21, redesignated June 11, 1970), did not maintain correctly and in an orderly, itemized manner, and did not keep current records of account reflecting all his financial transactions as a Customhouse Broker, in the following…”
O'Quinn v. United States, 100 F. Supp. 2d 1136 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2000).
· cites it 5× “For example, Defendants point to 19 C.F.R. § 111.21 (1997) to support their conclusion that choices (A) and (B) are incorrect.”
Twigger v. Schultz, 484 F.2d 856 (3rd Cir. 1973).
“21, Customs Regulations, as amended (19 CFR 111.21, redesignated June 11, 1970), did not maintain correctly and in an orderly, itemized manner, and did not keep current records of account reflecting all his financial transactions as a Customhouse Broker, in the following…”
IN RE: Grand Jury Proceedings, No. 4-10 (11th Cir. 2013).
“Customs Service sought to inspect McCoy’s records “in accordance with regulations [ 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.21 et seq.] requiring 25 Case: 12-13131 Date Filed: 02/07/2013 Page: 26 of 27 We likewise reject the Target’s assertion that the resolution of this question is controlled by our…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.