C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER III—INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE › PART 354—PROCEDURES FOR IMPOSING SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF AN ANTIDUMPING OR COUNTERVAILING DUTY ADMINISTRATIVE PROTECTIVE ORDER

19 C.F.R. § 354.1

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part sets forth the procedures for imposing sanctions for violation of an administrative protective order issued under 19 CFR 351.306, or successor regulations, as authorized by 19 U.S.C. 1677f(c).

[53 FR 47920, Nov. 28, 1988, as amended at 63 FR 24403, May 4, 1998]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1995 · leading case: Music Ctr. S.N.C. Di Luciano Pisoni & C. v. Prestini Musical Instruments Corp., 874 F. Supp. 543 (E.D.N.Y 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Music Ctr. S.N.C. Di Luciano Pisoni & C. v. Prestini Musical Instruments Corp., 874 F. Supp. 543 (E.D.N.Y 1995). “Department of Commerce not to initiate full adversary proceedings on the claimed breach on a finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe the APO was violated, see 19 C.F.R. § 354.1 et seq., did not allow it discovery or full adversary proceedings on the question of…”
Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. United States, 898 F.2d 780 (Fed. Cir. 1990). “Under 19 C.F.R. §§ 354.1 et seq. (1989), persons determined to have violated a protective order may be subjected to sanctions, including disbarment from practice before the ITA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.