(a) The State will provide the organizational structure, qualified personnel, medical consultant services, and a quality assurance function sufficient to ensure that disability determinations are made accurately and promptly. We may impose specific administrative requirements in these areas and in those under “Administrative Responsibilities and Requirements” in order to establish uniform, national administrative practices or to correct the areas of deficiencies which may later cause the State to be substantially failing to comply with our regulations or other written guidelines. We will notify the State, in writing, of the administrative requirements being imposed and of any administrative deficiencies it is required to correct. We will allow the State 90 days from the date of this notice to make appropriate corrections. Once corrected, we will monitor the State's administrative practices for 180 days. If the State does not meet the requirements or correct all of the deficiencies, or, if some of the deficiencies recur, we may initiate procedures to determine if the State is substantially failing to follow our regulations or other written guidelines.
(b) The State is responsible for making accurate and prompt disability determinations.
(c) Each State agency will designate experienced disability examiners to handle claims we refer to it under § 404.1619(a).
[46 FR 29204, May 29, 1981, as amended at 56 FR 11018, Mar. 14, 1991; 72 FR 51177, Sept. 6, 2007]
Notes of Decisions
Craig v. Commissioner of Social Security (2016)
nysd
“; 20 C.F.R. § 404.1620 (d). If not, the Commissioner continues to the fourth step and determines whether the claimant has the RFC to perform his past relevant work.”
Bennett v. Colvin (2016)
cand · cites it 2×
“See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1620 (f) and 416.920(f).”
Timothy R. HINKLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-App (1997)
ca10
“§ 1382c(a)(3)(A), “he must be found disabled without consideration of his age, education, and work experience,” citing 20 C.F.R. § 404.1620 (d)). Thus, a claimant’s physical impairment need not be independently disabling to meet the second prong of § 12.”
Kaddo v. Commissioner of Social Security (2017)
mied
“See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1620 (a)(4). The five steps are as follows: In step one, the SSA identifies claimants who “are doing substantial gainful activity” and concludes that these claimants are not disabled.”
Acevedo v. Colvin (2014)
nywd
“2000); see 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1620 , 416.920. C. Analysis of the ALJ’s Sequential Evaluation Reading Plaintiffs complaint liberally, Plaintiff appears to contest the ALJ’s RFC determination and credibility analysis, stating: “[b]ack pain makes it very difficult to perform most…”
Cooper v. Colvin (2016)
ilcd
“20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1620 (c), 416.920(c). If true, Step 3 requires a determination of whether the claimant is so severely impaired that he is disabled regardless of his age, education, and work experience.”
Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security (2016)
ohsd
“Assuming the claimant can no longer perform his or her past relevant work—and also considering the claimant’s age, education, past work experience, and RFC—do significant numbers of other jobs exist in the national economy which the claimant can perform? *830 20 C.F.R. §…”
Scheurer v. Berryhill (2017)
nywd
“2000); see 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1620 , 416.920. B. Summary of the ALJ’s Decision In applying the five-step sequential evaluation in this matter, ALJ O’Brien made the following determinations.”
Pierce v. Colvin (2017)
mad
“2d at 6-7 ; 20 C.F.R. § 404.1620 . The claimant’s RFC is the “the most [she] can still do despite [her] limitations.”
Moody v. Barnhart (2003)
alnd
“For the purposes of establishing entitlement to disability benefits, “physical or mental impairment” is defined as “an impairment that results from anatomical, physiological, or psychological abnormalities which are demonstrable by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.