(a) A sponsor shall submit an IND to FDA if the sponsor intends to conduct a clinical investigation with an investigational new drug that is subject to § 312.2(a).
(b) A sponsor shall not begin a clinical investigation subject to § 312.2(a) until the investigation is subject to an IND which is in effect in accordance with § 312.40.
(c) A sponsor shall submit a separate IND for any clinical investigation involving an exception from informed consent under § 50.24 of this chapter. Such a clinical investigation is not permitted to proceed without the prior written authorization from FDA. FDA shall provide a written determination 30 days after FDA receives the IND or earlier.
[52 FR 8831, Mar. 19, 1987, as amended at 61 FR 51529, Oct. 2, 1996; 62 FR 32479, June 16, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2024 · leading case:
Brennan v. Zafgen, Inc., 853 F.3d 606 (1st Cir. 2017).
Brennan v. Zafgen, Inc., 853 F.3d 606 (1st Cir. 2017).
“; see also 21 C.F.R. § 312.20 . If the FDA approves that request, human testing begins.”
Mohr v. Targeted Genetics, Inc., 690 F. Supp. 2d 711 (C.D. Ill. 2010).
· cites it 2× “See 21 C.F.R. § 312.20 . Before filing the IND, the applicant must have subjected biologically active agents of the proposed drug to comprehensive animal and human tissue testing.”
EUSA Pharma (US), Inc. v. Innocoll Pharm. Ltd., 594 F. Supp. 2d 570 (E.D. Pa. 2009).
“21 C.F.R. § 312.20 (a). Second, an Investiga-tional Review Board must approve the trial after reviewing its protocol and past clinical trials on animals.”
Cowan v. United States, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (N.D. Okla. 1998).
“” 21 C.F.R. § 312.20 (b). In accordance with § 312.”
In re Regulus Therapeutics Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 3:17-cv-00182 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2019).
“14 See 21 C.F.R. §§ 312.20 , 312.40. Generally, an IND must contain, inter alia, “[a] 15 summary of the pharmacological and toxicological effects of the drug in animals, 16 and to the extent known, in humans.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.