(a) In vitro diagnostic products are those reagents, instruments, and systems intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, including a determination of the state of health, in order to cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent disease or its sequelae. Such products are intended for use in the collection, preparation, and examination of specimens taken from the human body. These products are devices as defined in section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act), and may also be biological products subject to section 351 of the Public Health Service Act.
(b) A product class is all those products intended for use for a particular determination or for a related group of determinations or products with common or related characteristics or those intended for common or related uses. A class may be further divided into subclasses when appropriate.
(c) [Reserved]
(d) Act means the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
[41 FR 6903, Feb. 13, 1976, as amended at 45 FR 7484, Feb. 1, 1980; 89 FR 37445, May 6, 2024; 90 FR 45136, Sept. 19, 2025]
Notes of Decisions
United States v. An Undetermined No. of Unlabeled Cases, Etc., Clinical Reference Lab'y, Inc., Claimant-Appellant, 21 F.3d 1026 (10th Cir. 1994).
“See 21 C.F.R. § 809.3 (a) (in vitro diagnostic products “intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, including a determination of the state of health, in order to cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent disease or its sequelae”).”
Murphy Med. Assocs., LLC v. Cigna Health & Life Ins. Co. (D. Conn. 2022).
“” 21 C.F.R. § 809.3 . equals the cash price for such service as listed by the provider on a public internet website, or such plan or issuer may negotiate a rate with such provider for less than such cash price.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.