22 C.F.R. § 910.1

Requests to reopen cases

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Board may reconsider any decision upon the presentation of newly discovered or previously unavailable material evidence.

[50 FR 31358, Aug. 2, 1985. Redesignated at 56 FR 55460, Oct. 28, 1991]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2004–2006 · leading case: Ehrman v. United States, 429 F. Supp. 2d 61 (D.D.C. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Ehrman v. United States, 429 F. Supp. 2d 61 (D.D.C. 2006). · cites it 3× “) The FSGB subsequently denied this motion on May 17, 2004, relying on the discretion granted to it by 22 C.F.R. § 910.1 . (Admin. R. at 287.) Ehrman then initiated the present action for judicial review of the FSGB’s decision.”

Egan v. United States Agency for Int'l Dev., 381 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “Although not required by law to file a petition for reconsideration before obtaining judicial review of the FSGB’s order, see 22 C.F.R. § 910.1 , Egan filed two such petitions.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.