24 C.F.R. § 100.301

Exemption

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The provisions regarding familial status in this part do not apply to housing which satisfies the requirements of § 100.302, § 100.303 or § 100.304.

(b) Nothing in this part limits the applicability of any reasonable local, State, or Federal restrictions regarding the maximum number of occupants permitted to occupy a dwelling.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1998–2000 · leading case: Fair Hous. Advocates Assn. v. City of Richmond Heights, 998 F. Supp. 825 (N.D. Ohio 1998).
Fair Hous. Advocates Assn. v. City of Richmond Heights, 998 F. Supp. 825 (N.D. Ohio 1998). “The provision in 24 C.F.R. § 100.301 (b) provides: “Nothing in this part limits the applicability of any reasonable local, State or Federal restrictions regarding the maximum number of occupants permitted to occupy a dwelling.”
Reeves v. Rose, 108 F. Supp. 2d 720 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “The provision in 24 C.F.R. § 100.301 (b) provides: “Nothing in this part limits the applicability of any reasonable local, State or Federal restrictions regarding the maximum number of occupants permitted to occupy a dwelling.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.