(a) It shall be unlawful to make, print or publish, or cause to be made, printed or published, any notice, statement or advertisement with respect to the sale or rental of a dwelling which indicates any preference, limitation or discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, or an intention to make any such preference, limitation or discrimination.
(b) The prohibitions in this section shall apply to all written or oral notices or statements by a person engaged in the sale or rental of a dwelling. Written notices and statements include any applications, flyers, brochures, deeds, signs, banners, posters, billboards or any documents used with respect to the sale or rental of a dwelling.
(c) Discriminatory notices, statements and advertisements include, but are not limited to:
(1) Using words, phrases, photographs, illustrations, symbols or forms which convey that dwellings are available or not available to a particular group of persons because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
(2) Expressing to agents, brokers, employees, prospective sellers or renters or any other persons a preference for or limitation on any purchaser or renter because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin of such persons.
(3) Selecting media or locations for advertising the sale or rental of dwellings which deny particular segments of the housing market information about housing opportunities because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
(4) Refusing to publish advertising for the sale or rental of dwellings or requiring different charges or terms for such advertising because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
(d) 24 CFR part 109 provides information to assist persons to advertise dwellings in a nondiscriminatory manner and describes the matters the Department will review in evaluating compliance with the Fair Housing Act and in investigating complaints alleging discriminatory housing practices involving advertising.
Notes of Decisions
Campbell v. Robb, 162 F. App'x 460 (6th Cir. 2006).
· cites it 2× “” 24 C.F.R. § 100.75 (b) (2005); see also Heights Cmty.”
The Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa Mesa, 135 F.4th 645 (9th Cir. 2024).
· cites it 2× “§ 3604 (c); see also 24 C.F.R. § 100.75 (b). We have adopted “[a]n ‘objective ordinary’ reader” standard for determining whether a statement violates § 3604(c).”
LaFlamme v. New Horizons, Inc., 605 F. Supp. 2d 378 (D. Conn. 2009).
· cites it 2× “§ 3604 (c); 24 C.F.R. § 100.75 . Reading *388 this provision broadly, the Second Circuit notes that it “protects against the psychic injury caused by discriminatory statements made in connection with the housing market.”
Webster Bank v. Oakley, 830 A.2d 139 (Conn. 2003).
“70 ; (4) “[discriminatory advertisements, statements and notices”; 24 C.F.R. § 100.75 ; (5) “[discriminatory representations on the availability of dwellings”; 24 C.”
Noah v. Assor, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1284 (S.D. Fla. 2019).
“See Richards , 2005 WL 1065141 , at *7 (sustaining Section 3604(c) claim premised on orally expressed sexually harassing statements); see also 24 C.F.R. § 100.75 (b) ("The prohibitions in this section shall apply to all written or *1297 oral notices or statements by a person…”
Jeremy Morris v. West Hayden Estates First Add., 104 F.4th 1128 (9th Cir. 2024).
“§ 3604 (c); 24 C.F.R. 100.75(b). Once again, we first clarify the appropriate standard for determining whether a statement violates § 3604(c) of the Fair Housing Act.”
Greater New Orleans Fair Hous. Action Ctr. v. Kelly, 364 F. Supp. 3d 635 (E.D. La. 2019).
“" 24 C.F.R. § 100.75 (b) (emphasis added); see Collier , 2010 WL 3881381 , at *10 (oral statement to real estate agent indicating preference for renting to whites constituted violation of § 3604(c) ).”
Hall v. Lowder Realty Co., Inc., 160 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (M.D. Ala. 2001).
· cites it 2× “” 24 C.F.R. § 100.75 (b). Hall contends that Haviland violated § 3604(c) by telling her that the reason for the Washington referral was that Washington needed to work with a “strong black agent.”
Wentworth v. Hedson, 493 F. Supp. 2d 559 (E.D.N.Y 2007).
“” 24 C.F.R. § 100.75 (emphasis added); see also Soules v.”
— 24 C.F.R. § 100.75(b) — 4 cases
Jeremy Morris v. West Hayden Estates First Add., 104 F.4th 1128 (9th Cir. 2024).
“§ 3604 (c); 24 C.F.R. 100.75(b). Once again, we first clarify the appropriate standard for determining whether a statement violates § 3604(c) of the Fair Housing Act.”
— 24 C.F.R. § 100.75(c)(1) — 1 case
— 24 C.F.R. § 100.75(c)(2) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.