24 C.F.R. § 1000.324

How is the need component developed?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

After determining the FCAS allocation, remaining funds are allocated by need component. The need component consists of seven criteria. They are:

(a) American Indian and Alaskan Native (AIAN) Households with housing cost burden greater than 50 percent of formula annual income weighted at 22 percent;

(b) AIAN Households which are overcrowded or without kitchen or plumbing weighted at 25 percent;

(c) Housing Shortage which is the number of AIAN households with an annual income less than or equal to 80 percent of formula median income reduced by the combination of current assisted stock and units developed under NAHASDA weighted at 15 percent;

(d) AIAN households with annual income less than or equal to 30 percent of formula median income weighted at 13 percent;

(e) AIAN households with annual income between 30 percent and 50 percent of formula median income weighted at 7 percent;

(f) AIAN households with annual income between 50 percent and 80 percent of formula median income weighted at 7 percent;

(g) AIAN persons weighted at 11 percent.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 2009–2015 · leading case: United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 567 F.3d 1235 (10th Cir. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 567 F.3d 1235 (10th Cir. 2009). · cites it 10× “According to this definition, all that the use of the term "Indian area" in § 4152(b) indicates is that HUD must take into consideration the need of the area in which the applicant Indian tribe provides housing assistance it does not indicate that HUD may exclude an Indian…”

Fort Peck Hous. Auth. v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 367 F. App'x 884 (10th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R. § 1000.324 . 8 . See Appendix A to Part 1000 — Indian Housing block grant Formula Mechanics HUD, Nos.”

Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 353 (Fed. Cl. 2013). · cites it 3× “24 C.F.R. § 1000.324 . 5 *357 The regulations went on to define FCAS as the number of housing units owned or operated by a tribe as of September 30, 1997, immediately prior to the effective date of NAHASDA.”

Yakama Nation Hous. Auth. v. United States, 102 Fed. Cl. 478 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “24 C.F.R. § 1000.324 . The 2008 Amendment of NAHASDA On October 14, 2008, Congress amended NAHASDA by enacting the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Reauthorization Act of 2008, Pub.”

Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation, Lummi Nation Hous. Auth., Fort Berthold Hous. Auth., & Hopi Tribal Hous. Auth. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2013). · cites it 2× “Despite this regulatory directive, a 2001 audit by HUD’s Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) revealed that HUD had improperly administered the grant program by failing to exclude from the grant calculation housing units that were no longer 5 Pursuant to 24 C.F.R. § 1000.324 ,…”

Walker River Paiute Tribe v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 68 F. Supp. 3d 1202 (D. Nev. 2014). “See 24 C.F.R. § 1000.324 (identifying seven (7) weighted factors as part of the need component).”

Hous. Auth. of the Te-Moak Tribe of W. Shoshone Indians v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 85 F. Supp. 3d 1213 (D. Nev. 2015). “See 24 C.F.R. § 1000.324 (identifying seven (7) weighted factors as part of the need component).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.