24 C.F.R. § 201.17

Prepayment provision

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The note shall contain a provision permitting full or partial prepayment of the loan without penalty, except that the borrower may be assessed reasonable and customary charges for recording a release of the lender's security interest in the property, if permitted by State law.

[61 FR 19797, May 2, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2021 · leading case: Mark Burris, Louise Grider, & Lilla Smythe v. First Fin. Corp., & Home Owners Funding Corp. of Am., 928 F.2d 797 (1st Cir. 1991).
Mark Burris, Louise Grider, & Lilla Smythe v. First Fin. Corp., & Home Owners Funding Corp. of Am., 928 F.2d 797 (1st Cir. 1991). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R. § 201.17 (emphasis added). Burris, Grider and Smythe’s contracts explicitly state that no prepayment penalty will be imposed.”
Carol Lloyd v. New Jersey Hous. & Mortgag (3rd Cir. 2021). “According to Lloyd, “because HUD requires this language to be incorporated into the [N&M] which secure its federally insured loans, ( 24 C.F.R. § 201.17 (a)), doing so makes these regulations enforceable by borrowers .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.