C.F.R. » Title 24 » CHAPTER II—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR HOUSING—FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—MORTGAGE AND LOAN INSURANCE PROGRAMS UNDER NATIONAL HOUSING ACT AND OTHER AUTHORITIES › PART 203—SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE INSURANCE › Subpart B—Contract Rights and Obligations

24 C.F.R. § 203.381

Occupancy of property

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The mortgagee shall certify that the property is vacant and contains no personal property as of the date of filing for record of the deed to the Secretary or that the Secretary has consented to accept the property occupied.

[45 FR 59563, Sept. 10, 1980]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1971–1982 · leading case: Metro. Area Hous. All. v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 69 F.R.D. 633 (N.D. Ill. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Metro. Area Hous. All. v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 69 F.R.D. 633 (N.D. Ill. 1976). · cites it 4× “Waner, Director of the Chicago Area HUD office, seeking a declaration and concomitant injunctive order that HUD’s “vacancy requirement,” 24 C.F.R. § 203.381 (1975), as enforced and administered, violates various provisions of the National Housing Acts, the fifth amendment to the…”
Jean Caramico, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. The Sec'y of the Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., Defendants-Appellees-Appellants, 509 F.2d 694 (2d Cir. 1974). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R. § 203.381 (1974). Although the Secretary has apparently provided no formal standards for deciding whether property, may be conveyed occupied, HUD’s Property Disposition Handbook, One to Four Family Properties (4310.”
Caramico v. Romney, 390 F. Supp. 210 (E.D.N.Y 1973). · cites it 10× “, and (B) with respect to the waiver of the vacancy requirement set forth in 24 C.F.R. § 203.381 (as related to 12 U.S.”
Williamson v. Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 553 F. Supp. 542 (E.D.N.Y 1982). “When this litigation was commenced in 1978, these policies, which reflected HUD’s preference for vacant delivery of property covered by the program, were formally embodied in a set of regulations codified at 24 CFR 203.381 (1976). However, these regulations were apparently…”
Manners v. Sec'y of Hous. & Urban Dev., 333 F. Supp. 829 (E.D.N.Y 1971). “The only regulation which has been specifically referred to is 24 C.F.R. § 203.381 which provides “Unless otherwise approved by the Commissioner, the mortgagee shall certify that the property is vacant as of the date of the filing for record of the deed to the Commissioner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.