C.F.R. » Title 24 » CHAPTER II—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR HOUSING—FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT › SUBCHAPTER I—HUD-OWNED PROPERTIES › PART 290—DISPOSITION OF MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS AND SALE OF HUD-HELD MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGES › Subpart A—Disposition of Multifamily Projects

24 C.F.R. § 290.13

Negotiated sales

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

When HUD conducts a negotiated sale involving the disposition of a project to a person or entity without a public offering, the following provisions apply:

(a) HUD may negotiate the sale of any project to an agency of the federal, State, or local government.

(b) When HUD determines that a purchaser can demonstrate the capacity to own and operate a project in accordance with standards set by HUD, and/or a competitive offering will not generate offers of equal merit from qualified purchasers, HUD may approve a negotiated sale of a subsidized project to:

(1) A resident organization wishing to convert the project to a nonprofit or limited equity cooperative;

(2) A cooperative (e.g., nonprofit limited equity, consumer cooperative, mutual housing organization) with demonstrated experience in the operation of nonprofit (and preferably low-income) housing;

(3) A nonprofit entity that will continue to operate the project as low-income housing and whose governing board is composed of project residents;

(4) A State or local governmental entity with the demonstrated capacity to acquire, manage, and maintain the project as housing available to and affordable by low-income residents;

(5) A State or local governmental or nonprofit entity with the demonstrated capacity to acquire, manage, and maintain the project as a shelter for the homeless or other public purpose, generally when the project is vacant or has minimal occupancy and is not needed in the area for continued use as rental housing for the elderly or families; or

(6) Other nonprofit organizations.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1999 · leading case: Christopher Vill., Ltd. P'ship v. Retsinas, 190 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Christopher Vill., Ltd. P'ship v. Retsinas, 190 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 1999). “" 24 C.F.R. 290.13(a). 7 .At oral argument, HUD represented to this court that it owned the property and had spent several million dollars renovating it when, in fact, it had already transferred the property to the City of Bryan several months before.”
Marie Conille v. Sec'y of Hous. & Urban Dev., 840 F.2d 105 (1st Cir. 1988). “…him to maintain MIP properties "in compliance with State and local property management licensing requirements.” 24 C.F. R. § 290.13(a)(l)(ix).”
— 24 C.F.R. § 290.13(a) — 1 case
Christopher Vill., Ltd. P'ship v. Retsinas, 190 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 1999). “" 24 C.F.R. 290.13(a). 7 .At oral argument, HUD represented to this court that it owned the property and had spent several million dollars renovating it when, in fact, it had already transferred the property to the City of Bryan several months before.”
— 24 C.F.R. § 290.13(a)(l)(ix) — 1 case
Marie Conille v. Sec'y of Hous. & Urban Dev., 840 F.2d 105 (1st Cir. 1988). “…him to maintain MIP properties "in compliance with State and local property management licensing requirements.” 24 C.F. R. § 290.13(a)(l)(ix).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.