(a) URA. HUD-assisted programs and projects are subject to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. 4601 (URA) (42 U.S.C. 4601), and implementing regulations issued by the Department of Transportation at 49 CFR part 24.
(b) Section 104(d). In addition to the URA, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG), and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs are also subject to section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5304(d)). The provisions applicable to these programs are set out in subpart C of this part.
(c) Additional requirements. Applicable program regulations may contain additional relocation provisions.
Notes of Decisions
Robzen's Inc. v. US Dept. of Hous., 515 F. Supp. 228 (M.D. Penn. 1981).
“See 24 CFR § 42.1 , et seq. (1980). This Memorandum offers no opinion concerning the validity of the Robzen’s claim under the present rules.”
Peoples Apparel, Ltd., 226 Ct. Cl. 515 (Ct. Cl. 1980).
“and HUD regulations set forth at 24 C.F.R. § 42.1 et seq. 7 Since plaintiff has not paid money to the United States, it must establish a claim against the United States based on a law which grants it either "expressly or by implication a right to be paid a sum certain.”
Moorer v. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 417 F. Supp. 1261 (W.D. Mo. 1976).
“24 C.F.R. § 42.1 . et seq. (1975). HUD argues that these regulations preclude URA benefits where there is no federal acquisition or federal financial assistance to a state or state agency which acquires real property.”
Pietroniro v. Borough of Oceanport, 764 F.2d 976 (3rd Cir. 1985).
· cites it 2× “§ 4625 and the applicable federal regulations, 24 C.F.R. § 42.1 et seq. (1971). A jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiffs for $197,-950.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.