24 C.F.R. § 583.405

Program changes

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) HUD approval. (1) A recipient may not make any significant changes to an approved program without prior HUD approval. Significant changes include, but are not limited to, a change in the recipient, a change in the project site, additions or deletions in the types of activities listed in § 583.100 of this part approved for the program or a shift of more than 10 percent of funds from one approved type of activity to another, and a change in the category of participants to be served. Depending on the nature of the change, HUD may require a new certification of consistency with the consolidated plan (see § 583.155).

(2) Approval for changes is contingent upon the application ranking remaining high enough after the approved change to have been competitively selected for funding in the year the application was selected.

(b) Documentation of other changes. Any changes to an approved program that do not require prior HUD approval must be fully documented in the recipient's records.

[58 FR 13871, Mar. 15, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 51176, Sept. 30, 1996]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2001 · leading case: Westmoreland Human Opportunities, Inc. v. James R. Walsh, Tr. of the Bankr. Est. of Life Serv. Sys., Inc. Life Serv. Sys., Inc, 246 F.3d 233 (3rd Cir. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Westmoreland Human Opportunities, Inc. v. James R. Walsh, Tr. of the Bankr. Est. of Life Serv. Sys., Inc. Life Serv. Sys., Inc, 246 F.3d 233 (3rd Cir. 2001). “” 24 C.F.R. § 583.405 (a)(1) (2000). This general restraint on a grantee’s ability to alienate or assign its interest in the grant arrangement with HUD is also reflected in a provision of the Grant Agreement executed between LSS and HUD: “No change may be made to the project nor…”

Westmoreland Human Opportunities, Inc. v. Walsh, 260 F.3d 233 (3rd Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “” 24 C.F.R. § 583.405 (a)(1) (2000). This general restraint on a grantee’s ability to alienate or assign its interest in the grant arrangement with HUD is also reflected in a provision of the Grant Agreement executed between LSS and HUD: “No change may be made to the project nor…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.