24 C.F.R. § 8.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C 794), to the end that no otherwise qualified individual with handicaps in the United States shall, solely by reason of his or her handicap, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This part also implements section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5309). This part does not effectuate section 504 as it applies to any program or activity conducted by the Department. Compliance with this part does not assure compliance with requirements for accessibility by physically-handicapped persons imposed under the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157; 24 CFR part 40).

(b) The policies and standards for compliance established by this part are established in contemplation of, and with a view to enforcement through, the Department's administration of programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance and the administrative procedures described in subpart D (including, without limitation, judicial enforcement under § 8.57(a)).

[53 FR 20233, June 2, 1988, as amended at 83 FR 26361, June 7, 2018]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2025 · leading case: Taylor v. Hous. Auth. of New Haven, 267 F.R.D. 36 (D. Conn. 2010).
Taylor v. Hous. Auth. of New Haven, 267 F.R.D. 36 (D. Conn. 2010). · cites it 2× “HUD explains that 24 C.F.R. § 8.1 (b). In turn, the compliance provisions in Subpart D of part 8 (“Enforcement”) specify the contemplated enforcement scheme, which is primarily administrative.”
Crossroads Apts. Assocs. v. LeBoo, 152 Misc. 2d 830 (1991). “” LeBoo answers affirmatively that he is a handicapped person as defined by section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( 29 USC § 794 ) and its implementary regulations (24 CFR 8.1 et seq.) and as defined by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 ( 42 USC § 3602 [h]) and its…”
Michel-Wiggins v. U.S. Hous. & Urban Dev. (D.D.C. 2025). “24 C.F.R. §§ 8.1 , 8.4. That Michel-Wiggins has not identified a flaw in HUD’s regulations only confirms that she is challenging a decision made by the local housing agency, not HUD.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.