24 C.F.R. § 880.205

Limitation on distributions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Non-profit owners are not entitled to distributions of project funds.

(b) For the life of the Contract, project funds may only be distributed to profit-motivated owners at the end of each fiscal year of project operation following the effective date of the Contract after all project expenses have been paid, or funds have been set aside for payment, and all reserve requirements have been met. The first year's distribution may not be made until cost certification, where applicable, is completed. Distributions may not exceed the following maximum returns:

(1) For projects for elderly families, the first year's distribution will be limited to 6 percent on equity. The Assistant Secretary may provide for increases in subsequent years' distributions on an annual or other basis so that the permitted return reflects a 6 percent return on the value in subsequent years, as determined by HUD, of the approved initial equity. Any such adjustment will be made by Notice in the Federal Register.

(2) For projects for non-elderly families, the first year's distribution will be limited to 10 percent on equity. The Assistant Secretary may provide for increases in subsequent years' distributions on an annual or other basis so that the permitted return reflects a 10 percent return on the value in subsequent years, as determined by HUD, of the approved initial equity. Any such adjustment will be made by Notice in the Federal Register.

(c) For the purpose of determining the allowable distribution, an owner's equity investment in a project is deemed to be 10 percent of the replacement cost of the part of the project attributable to dwelling use accepted by HUD at cost certification (see § 880.405) unless the owner justifies a higher equity contribution by cost certification documentation in accordance with HUD mortgage insurance procedures.

(d) Any short-fall in return may be made up from surplus project funds in future years.

(e) If HUD determines at any time that project funds are more than the amount needed for project operations, reserve requirements and permitted distribution, HUD may require the excess to be placed in an account to be used to reduce housing assistance payments or for other project purposes. Upon termination of the Contract, any excess funds must be remitted to HUD.

(f) Owners of small projects or partially-assisted projects are exempt from the limitation on distributions contained in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.

(g) In the case of HUD-insured projects, the provisions of this section will apply instead of the otherwise applicable mortgage insurance program provisions.

(h) HUD may permit increased distributions of surplus cash, in excess of the amounts otherwise permitted, to profit-motivated owners who participate in a HUD-approved initiative or program to preserve below-market housing stock. The increased distributions will be limited to a maximum amount based on market rents and calculated according to HUD instructions. Funds that the owner is authorized to retain under section 236(g)(2) of the National Housing Act are not considered distributions to the owner.

(i) Any State or local law or regulation that restricts distributions to an amount lower than permitted by this section or permitted by the Commissioner under this paragraph (i) is preempted to the extent provided by section 524(f) of the Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997.

[44 FR 59410, Oct. 15, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 18923, Mar. 24, 1980; 49 FR 6714, Feb. 23, 1984; 61 FR 5212, Feb. 9, 1996; 65 FR 61074, Oct. 13, 2000]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1980–1994 · leading case: Rebelwood, Ltd. v. Hinds Cnty., 544 So. 2d 1356 (Miss. 1989).
Rebelwood, Ltd. v. Hinds Cnty., 544 So. 2d 1356 (Miss. 1989). “24 C.F.R. § 880.205 (1988). Testimony regarding the operation of Rebelwood showed an annual gross income of approximately $670,000.”
Soc'y Hill Civic Ass'n v. Harris, 632 F.2d 1045 (3rd Cir. 1980). “24 C.F.R. § 880.205 (h) (1979). A similar provision is included in the requirements for final proposals.”
Carson v. Alvord, 487 F. Supp. 1049 (N.D. Ga. 1980). “24 C.F.R. § 880.205 . These proposals are then reviewed by HUD in accordance with the technical, financial, and other requirements of 24 C.”
Alschuler v. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 686 F.2d 472 (7th Cir. 1982). “2d at 1058 (analogous requirement under 24 C.F.R. § 880.205 (h) (1979)). Moreover, the HUD regulation in question was first adopted as part of the major overhaul of section 8 regulations after enactment of the 1974 Act.”
Bus. Ass'n of Univ. City v. Landrieu, 660 F.2d 867 (3rd Cir. 1981). “See 24 C.F.R. § 880.205 et seq. (1979). The administrative regulations promulgated by HUD require its officials to review these proposals for compliance with technical, financial, fair-housing/equal opportunity, and environmental requirements.”
Myrtle Manor Apts. v. City of Phoenix, 868 P.2d 1048 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “*468 24 C.F.R. section 880.205 sets the limitations on the distribution of project funds to the owner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.