24 C.F.R. § 965.401

Individually metered utilities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) All utility service shall be individually metered to residents, either through provision of retail service to the residents by the utility supplier or through the use of checkmeters, unless:

(1) Individual metering is impractical, such as in the case of a central heating system in an apartment building;

(2) Change from a mastermetering system to individual meters would not be financially justified based upon a benefit/cost analysis; or

(3) Checkmetering is not permissible under State or local law, or under the policies of the particular utility supplier or public service commission.

(b) If checkmetering is not permissible, retail service shall be considered. Where checkmetering is permissible, the type of individual metering offering the most savings to the PHA shall be selected.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1990–1994 · leading case: Larry v. Yamauchi, 753 F. Supp. 784 (E.D. Ark. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Larry v. Yamauchi, 753 F. Supp. 784 (E.D. Ark. 1990). · cites it 2× “R. § 965.474 . It is therefore possible for a tenant who conserves energy to receive a gain in real income from the utility reimbursement.”

West v. Sullivan, 973 F.2d 179 (3rd Cir. 1992). · cites it 2× “The PHUA is based on the average reasonable monthly utility cost for households in the area over the course of a year.”

Crochet v. Hous. Auth., 37 F.3d 607 (11th Cir. 1994). · cites it 3× “” 24 C.F.R. § 965.401 (1993); see 24 C.F.R.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.