24 C.F.R. § 966.5

Posting of policies, rules and regulations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Schedules of special charges for services, repairs and utilities and rules and regulations which are required to be incorporated in the lease by reference shall be publicly posted in a conspicuous manner in the Project Office and shall be furnished to applicants and tenants on request. Such schedules, rules and regulations may be modified from time to time by the PHA provided that the PHA shall give at least 30-day written notice to each affected tenant setting forth the proposed modification, the reasons therefor, and providing the tenant an opportunity to present written comments which shall be taken into consideration by the PHA prior to the proposed modification becoming effective. A copy of such notice shall be:

(a) Delivered directly or mailed to each tenant; or

(b) Posted in at least three (3) conspicuous places within each structure or building in which the affected dwelling units are located, as well as in a conspicuous place at the project office, if any, of if none, a similar central business location within the project.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1986–2008 · leading case: Corpus Christi Hous. Auth. v. Lara, 267 S.W.3d 222 (Tex. App. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Corpus Christi Hous. Auth. v. Lara, 267 S.W.3d 222 (Tex. App. 2008). “24 C.F.R. § 966.5 l(a)(2)(i)(A)-(B) (2008).”

Jones v. Hous. Auth. of Montgomery, 495 So. 2d 1103 (Ala. Civ. App. 1986). · cites it 3× “4 (0(1) (1984) and 24 C.F.R. § 966.5 (1984). Twenty-four C.F.”

Flowers v. Smith, 726 F. Supp. 141 (S.D. Miss. 1988). “The HUD regulation regarding the posting of policies, rules and regulations is found at 24 C.F.R. § 966.5 and provides as follows: Schedules of special charges for services, repairs and utilities and rules and regulations which are required to be incorporated in the lease by…”

Brown v. Philadelphia Hous. Auth., 237 F. Supp. 2d 567 (E.D. Pa. 2002). “(b) their failure to comply with the grievance process mandated by 24 C.F.R. §§ 966.5 et seq.; (c) their failure to comply with the provisions of the consent decree in Brown v.”

Simmons v. Kemp, 751 F. Supp. 815 (D. Minnesota 1990). “24 C.F.R. §§ 966.5 , 966.4(m), (n). 4 . Rule 34 states in part: The request [for discovery] may, without leave of court, be served upon any party with or after service of the summons and complaint.”

Thornton v. Butler, 728 F. Supp. 679 (M.D. Ala. 1990). “Second, they maintain that Thornton had notice that she was about to be evicted because she attempted to use the grievance procedures contained in 24 C.F.R. § 966.5 (1989). Thornton apparently requested a grievance conference but never received one because her project manager…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.