24 C.F.R. § 966.50
Purpose and scope
The purpose of this subpart is to set forth the requirements, standards and criteria for a grievance procedure to be established and implemented by public housing agencies (PHAs) to assure that a PHA tenant is afforded an opportunity for a hearing if the tenant disputes within a reasonable time any PHA action or failure to act involving the tenant's lease with the PHA or PHA regulations which adversely affect the individual tenant's rights, duties, welfare or status.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2024 · leading case: Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Hous. Auth., 479 U.S. 418 (1987).
Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Hous. Auth., 479 U.S. 418 (1987). “III) and HUD's implementing regulations, 24 CFR § 966.50 et seq. (1986); and HUD's comments accompanying its final utilities regulations, 49 Fed.”
Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. Dist. of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “24 C.F.R. § 966.50 (1984); see also id. § 966.”
Hous. Auth., Cnty. of Salt Lake v. Snyder, 2002 UT 28 (Utah 2002). “See generally, 24 C.F.R. § 966.50 (2000). Snyder's Lease Agreement, however, did not include, or incorporate by reference, this required information.”
Caro v. Hous. Auth. of City of Austin, 794 S.W.2d 901 (Tex. App. 1990). “005(a) (1989); see also 24 C.F.R. § 966.50 et seq. (1989). *903 The factual elements of the controversy are not disputed.”
Shepherd v. Weldon Mediation Servs., Inc., 794 F. Supp. 2d 1173 (W.D. Wash. 2011). “” 24 C.F.R. § 966.50 . Each PHA must adopt its own grievance procedures, must incorporate those procedures in every tenant’s lease, must provide a copy of the grievance procedure to tenants and residential organizations, and must provide notice and an opportunity to comment…”
Laticia Farley v. Philadelphia Hous. Auth. Floyd Baker Pamela Dunbar Claude Ross, 102 F.3d 697 (3rd Cir. 1996). “See 24 C.F.R. §§ 966.50 , 966.51(a), 966.53(a) (1994).”
Lora M. Saxton v. Hous. Auth. of the City of Tacoma William Hunter, Exec. Dir. of the Hous. Auth. of the City of Tacoma, 1 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 1993). “We therefore hold that a public housing tenant whose request to add a returning family member to the lease is denied is entitled to a grievance hearing under the procedures specified in 24 C.F.R. § 966.50 et seq. (1992). We conclude, however, that such a hearing could not have…”
Carrera v. Yepez, 6 S.W.3d 654 (Tex. App. 1999). “24 C.F.R. § 966.50 . Further, (a)(1) The PHA grievance procedure shall be applicable (except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section) to all individual grievances as defined in Sec.”
Adams v. Philadelphia Hous. Auth. (In Re Adams), 94 B.R. 838 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1989). “An opportunity to invoke mandatory internal housing authority grievance procedures, as set forth in 24 C.F.R. §§ 966.50 , et seq., must be accorded to the evictee.”
Holcomb v. Williams, 72 A.D.3d 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010). “Unlike, for example, 24 CFR 966.50 et seq., and 24 CFR 982.555, the plain language of 24 CFR 583.”
Bell v. Philadelphia Hous. Auth. (In Re Bell), 97 B.R. 208 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1989). “An opportunity to invoke mandatory internal housing authority grievance procedures, as set forth in 24 C.F.R. §§ 966.50 , et seq., must be accorded to the evictee.”
McLaughlin v. Hernandez, 16 A.D.3d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). “The notice provided by NYCHA was clearly consistent with federal and state law, regulations and administrative policy governing tenancy termination proceedings in public housing, wherein NYCHA is not obligated to serve such notice on household members other than the tenant of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.