24 C.F.R. § 966.52

Requirements

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Each PHA shall adopt a grievance procedure affording each tenant an opportunity for a hearing on a grievance as defined in § 966.53 in accordance with the requirements, standards, and criteria contained in this subpart. A PHA may establish an expedited grievance procedure as defined in § 966.53.

(b) The PHA grievance procedure shall be included in, or incorporated by reference in, all tenant dwelling leases pursuant to subpart A of this part.

(c) The PHA shall provide at least 30 days notice to tenants and resident organizations setting forth proposed changes in the PHA grievance procedure, and providing an opportunity to present written comments. Subject to requirements of this subpart, comments submitted shall be considered by the PHA before adoption of any grievance procedure changes by the PHA.

(d) The PHA shall furnish a copy of the grievance procedure to each tenant and to resident organizations.

(e) The PHA must not only meet the minimal procedural due process requirements contained in this subpart but also satisfy any additional requirements required by local, state, or federal law.

[56 FR 51579, Oct. 11, 1991, as amended at 81 FR 12374, Mar. 8, 2016]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2024 · leading case: Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. Snyder

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. Snyder (2002) utah · cites it 2× “" 24 C.F.R. § 966.52 (b) (2000); see also 24 CFR.”

Gloria Hodge, Lorenza Chavez and Elizabeth Duberry v. The Department of Housing and Urban Development, Housing Division, (1989) ca11 “24 C.F.R. § 966.52 (1988). Pursuant to HUD’s guidelines, the rules adopted by the PHAs must be made part of all the tenants’ leases.”

Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (1994) paed “Specifically, PHA points out that it has established informal and formal grievance procedures whereby its tenants can make complaints that have not been satisfactorily resolved at the local management level. These procedures were established as a result of an action filed by CLS…”

Lora M. Saxton v. Housing Authority of the City of Tacoma William Hunter, Executive Director of the Housing Authority of (1993) ca9 “See 24 C.F.R. § 966.52 (a) (1992). We are not persuaded by THA’s argument that it took no “action or inaction” regarding the lease.”

Conway v. Housing Authority of City of Asheville (2002) ncwd “§ 1437d(k) and 24 C.F.R. § 966.52 is clear and mandatory.”

Adams v. Franco (1996) nysupct “Pursuant to 24 CFR 966.52 and 966.53, a remaining head of household must be afforded "an opportunity for a hearing on a grievance” before being evicted.”

Bennington Housing Authority v. Bush (2007) vt “The right to a fairly elaborate hearing process is established by the regulations, see 24 C.F.R. §§ 966.52 -.57, which include a provision that: At the hearing, the complainant must first make a showing of an entitlement to the relief sought and thereafter the [public housing…”

Hill City Housing Authority v. Nevins (2024) kanctapp “) 24 C.F.R. § 966.52 (b) (2022). The purpose of such procedures is "to assure that a PHA tenant is afforded an opportunity for a hearing if the tenant disputes within a reasonable time any PHA action .”

Copeland v. United States (2008) flsd “See 24 C.F.R. § 966.52 . After a tenant is approved for the Section 8 program and receives a voucher from the local public housing authority, the tenant locates a dwelling unit that is owned by a private landlord.”

— 24 C.F.R. § 966.52(b) — 1 case

Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. Snyder (2002) utah “" 24 C.F.R. § 966.52 (b) (2000); see also 24 CFR.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.