C.F.R. » Title 24 » CHAPTER IX—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR PUBLIC AND INDIAN HOUSING, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT › PART 982—SECTION 8 TENANT-BASED ASSISTANCE: HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER PROGRAM › Subpart I—Dwelling Unit: Housing Quality Standards, Subsidy Standards, Inspection and Maintenance

24 C.F.R. § 982.407

Enforcement of HQS

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Part 982 does not create any right of the family, or any party other than HUD or the PHA, to require enforcement of the HQS requirements by HUD or the PHA, or to assert any claim against HUD or the PHA, for damages, injunction or other relief, for alleged failure to enforce the HQS.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2577-0169) [60 FR 34695, July 3, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 45661, Sept. 1, 1995; 80 FR 8246, Feb. 17, 2015. Redesignated at 81 FR 12375, Mar. 8, 2016]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2016–2026 · leading case: Volis v. Hous. Auth. of Los Angeles Employees, 670 F. App'x 543 (9th Cir. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Volis v. Hous. Auth. of Los Angeles Employees, 670 F. App'x 543 (9th Cir. 2016). “See 24 C.F.R. §§ 982.407 , 982.456. We do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal or in the reply brief, including whether Volis’ belated filing of a claim in August 2014 meets the requirements under the California Government Claims Act.”
Clifford v. DewBury Homes (D. Utah 2022). “46 Clifford cites to limited cases where courts found a private cause of action in the Housing Act, but none of those circumstances apply here.47 Clifford also cites to various other cases, statutes, regulations, and constitutional provisions as sources of subject matter…”
Sheyanne Van Matre individually & as parent & Nat. guardian of Kenyana Badders & Karter Van Matre, deceased min (S.D. Ind. 2026). “Code §§ 34-13 - 3-3(a)(8), (a)(12), that Van Matre's claims are preempted and barred by 24 C.F.R. § 982.407 (formerly § 982.406 (2015)), and that it did not owe any common law duty of care to Van Matre.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.